Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533522›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Because its power remains naturalized: introducing the settler colonial determinants of health.

Bram Wispelwey, Osama Tanous, Yara Asi, Weeam Hammoudeh, David Mills

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
23.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Oral Cancer Prognostic Disparities among Black Individuals: A Scoping Review.Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Advancing brain health equity with Indigenous peoples: A critical imperative.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Formation and Transformation of Medical Apartheid in Palestine: A Historical Examination.International journal of social determinants of health and health services · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Decolonising women's health innovation.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The legacy of colonialism and commercial tobacco-caused social inequities.Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Bram WispelweyDepartment of Global Health and Population, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Osama TanousFrançois-Xavier Bagnoud Center for Health and Human Rights, School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Yara AsiSchool of Global Health Management and Informatics, College of Community Innovation and Education, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, United States.
Weeam HammoudehInstitute of Community and Public Health, Birzeit University, Birzeit, Palestine.
David MillsDivision of Emergency Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Indigenous people suffer earlier death and more frequent and severe disease than their settler counterparts, a remarkably persistent reality over time, across settler colonized geographies, and despite their ongoing resistance to elimination. Although these health inequities are well-known, they have been impervious to comprehensive and convincing explication, let alone remediation. Settler colonial studies, a fast-growing multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary field, is a promising candidate to rectify this impasse. Settler colonialism's relationship to health inequity is at once obvious and incompletely described, a paradox arising from epistemic coloniality and perceived analytic challenges that we address here in three parts. First, in considering settler colonialism an enduring structure rather than a past event, and by wedding this fundamental insight to the ascendant structural paradigm for understanding health inequities, a picture emerges in which this system of power serves as a foundational and ongoing configuration determining social and political mechanisms that impose on human health. Second, because modern racialization has served to solidify and maintain the hierarchies of colonial relations, settler colonialism adds explanatory power to racism's health impacts and potential amelioration by historicizing this process for differentially racialized groups. Finally, advances in structural racism methodologies and the work of a few visionary scholars have already begun to elucidate the possibilities for a body of literature linking settler colonialism and health, illuminating future research opportunities and pathways toward the decolonization required for health equity.

Indexed as

Health EquityIndigenous PeoplesColonialismHumanshealth equityindigenous healthlogic of eliminationsettler colonialism and native dispossessionsocial determinantsstructural racism

Identifiers

PMID37533522
PMCPMC10393129
OpenAlexW4383912837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.