Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533417›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Key factors associated with quality of postnatal care: a pooled analysis of 23 countries.

Shuangyu Zhao, Yixuan Zhang, Angela Y Xiao, Qiwei He, Kun Tang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Shuangyu ZhaoVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Yixuan ZhangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Angela Y XiaoVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Qiwei HeVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Kun TangVanke School of Public Health, Tsinghua University, No. 30, Shuangqing Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100084, PR China.
Tsinghua University · CNBeijing Jiaotong University · CNChinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Progress in reducing maternal and neonatal mortality, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) and regions, is insufficient to achieve the Sustainable Developmental Goals by 2030. High-quality postnatal care (PNC) for mothers and neonates is crucial for mothers and babies, yet it remains the most neglected intervention on the continuum of maternal and child care. We aimed to estimate the associations between observable factors and high-quality maternal and neonatal PNC in pooled and country-specific analyses. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we used the most recent (2015-2022) Demographic and Health Surveys from 23 countries across Africa (n = 14), Southeast Asia (n = 3), Eastern Mediterranean (n = 2), Europe (n = 2), Americas (n = 1), and Western Pacific (n = 1). Women who, within the last 5 years, were aged 15-49 years at their last live birth that had delivered a singleton child were included. We identified eleven PNC behaviours recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) to measure PNC quality, and applied thresholds to create binary outcomes for quality maternal and neonatal PNC. 15 factors were included in our analysis to assess their association with high-quality PNC for mothers and neonates in a series of single-adjusted and mutually adjusted logistic regression models, both in pooled and country-specific analysis. We also conducted two sets of subgroup analyses for place of residence and maternal age at last birth, and two sets of supplementary analyses to test the robustness of the results. Findings: Among 172,526 women and their most recent child, 41.42% (40.93-41.91) received quality maternal PNC while 42.34% (41.86-42.83) received quality neonatal PNC. In the pooled analysis, we found that the factors showing the strongest associations with quality maternal PNC were delivery by skilled birth attendants (SBAs) (OR: 4.92; 95% CI: 4.32-5.59), four or more antenatal care (ANC) visits (OR: 1.69, 1.58-1.81), and institutional delivery (OR: 1.61; 1.46-1.78). Consistent results were found for all factors of quality newborn care (e.g., delivery by SBA: OR, 4.25; 3.75-4.81; four or more ANC visits: OR, 1.83; 1.70-1.96) except institutional delivery. The association between these leading factors and PNC quality were broadly consistent across countries. Subgroup analyses and sensitivity analyses showed generally consistent results. Interpretation: Our study demonstrated that institutional delivery and frequent ANC visits had the strongest positive associations with quality PNC for both mothers and neonates. Our findings highlight that improvements to the quality of maternal and neonatal PNC in the LMICs we assessed are urgently needed to achieve ambitious maternal, newborn, and child health goals. Funding: China National Natural Science Foundation.

Indexed as

Key factorsMaternal and neonate healthPostnatal careQuality of care

Identifiers

PMID37533417
PMCPMC10393561
OpenAlexW4385279943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.