Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533246›Full record

ReviewCurrent neuropharmacology2024

Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Nuclear Imaging of Parkinsonian Disorders: Where do we go from here?

Félix-Antoine Savoie, David J Arpin, David E Vaillancourt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current neuropharmacology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in GPCR-Targeted PET Radiotracer Patents (2020-2025).Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Félix-Antoine SavoieDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, Laboratory for Rehabilitation Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David J ArpinDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, Laboratory for Rehabilitation Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David E VaillancourtDepartment of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, Laboratory for Rehabilitation Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.

Funding

Role of the Cortex and Cerebellum in Visually-Guided Motor BehaviorR01NS058487 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI JAFFEE, MICHAEL S., VAILLANCOURT, DAVID E · 2008 to 2025
$6.1M
Web-based Automated Imaging Differentiation of ParkinsonismU01NS119562 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI BARMPOUTIS, ANGELOS, OKUN, MICHAEL S · 2021 to 2025
$4.8M
Supplement: SCH: Enabling Data Outsourcing and Sharing for AI-powered Parkinson's ResearchR01LM014027 · NLM · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI CHEN, SHIGANG, WU, SAMUEL S · 2021 to 2024
$1.5M
Fonds de Recherche du Québec - Santé 286530NIH HHS R01 NS058487, R01 NS052318, U01 NS119562, T32 NS0821696NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS058487NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS119562NLM NIH HHS R01 LM014027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Parkinsonian disorders are a heterogeneous group of incurable neurodegenerative diseases that significantly reduce quality of life and constitute a substantial economic burden. Nuclear imaging (NI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have played and continue to play a key role in research aimed at understanding and monitoring these disorders. MRI is cheaper, more accessible, nonirradiating, and better at measuring biological structures and hemodynamics than NI. NI, on the other hand, can track molecular processes, which may be crucial for the development of efficient diseasemodifying therapies. Given the strengths and weaknesses of NI and MRI, how can they best be applied to Parkinsonism research going forward? This review aims to examine the effectiveness of NI and MRI in three areas of Parkinsonism research (differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring) to highlight where they can be most impactful. Based on the available literature, MRI can assist with differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring as well as NI. However, more work is needed, to confirm the value of MRI for monitoring prodromal disease and predicting phenoconversion. Although NI can complement or be a substitute for MRI in all the areas covered in this review, we believe that its most meaningful impact will emerge once reliable Parkinsonian proteinopathy tracers become available. Future work in tracer development and high-field imaging will continue to influence the landscape for NI and MRI.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingParkinsonian DisordersAnimalsBrainHumansNeuroimagingcerebral blood flowcorticobasal degeneration.magnetic resonance imagingMSAnuclear imagingParkinson’s disease

Identifiers

PMID37533246
PMCPMC11284713

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.