Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533118›Full record

ReviewLaboratory animal research2023

Staphylococcus xylosus and Staphylococcus aureus as commensals and pathogens on murine skin.

Michael Battaglia, Lee Ann Garrett-Sinha

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Laboratory animal research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gut microbes reports · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Genomic characterization of a multidrug-resistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Novel probioticFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Non-Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael BattagliaDepartment of Biochemistry, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA.
Lee Ann Garrett-SinhaDepartment of Biochemistry, Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14203, USA. leesinha@buffalo.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7806-4352
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · US

Funding

Regulation and Consequences of Ets1 Downregulation in B CellsR01AI122720 · NIAID · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI GARRETT-SINHA, LEE ANN, SATTERTHWAITE, ANNE B · 2016 to 2020
$2.6M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122720
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin ulcers, skin dermatitis and skin infections are common phenomena in colonies of laboratory mice and are often found at increased prevalence in certain immunocompromised strains. While in many cases these skin conditions are mild, in other cases they can be severe and lead to animal morbidity. Furthermore, the presence of skin infections and ulcerations can complicate the interpretation of experimental protocols, including those examining immune cell activation. Bacterial species in the genus Staphylococcus are the most common pathogens recovered from skin lesions in mice. In particular, Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus xylosus have both been implicated as pathogens on murine skin. Staphylococcus aureus is a well-known pathogen of human skin, but S. xylosus skin infections in humans have not been described, indicating that there is a species-specific difference in the ability of S. xylosus to serve as a skin pathogen. The aim of this review is to summarize studies that link S. aureus and S. xylosus to skin infections of mice and to describe factors involved in their adherence to tissue and their virulence. We discuss potential differences in mouse and human skin that might underlie the ability of S. xylosus to act as a pathogen on murine skin, but not human skin. Finally, we also describe mouse mutants that have shown increased susceptibility to skin infections with staphylococcal bacteria. These mutants point to pathways that are important in the control of commensal staphylococcal bacteria. The information here may be useful to researchers who are working with mouse strains that are prone to skin infections with staphylococcal bacteria.

Indexed as

InfectionSkinSpecies-specific differencesStaphylococcus aureusStaphylococcus xylosusVirulence

Identifiers

PMID37533118
PMCPMC10394794
OpenAlexW4385494542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.