Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37533003›Full record

ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2023

Socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes among Thai older population in the era of Universal Health Coverage: trends and decomposition analysis.

Sirinya Kaikeaw, Sureeporn Punpuing, Chalermpol Chamchan, Pramote Prasartkul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal for equity in health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Changes in health-related quality of life and inequality in China: evidence from a nationwide repeated cross-sectional survey (2021-2023).Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  12. Socio-demographic disparities in health-related quality of life in hypertensive patients in Bangladesh: a comprehensive survey analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Health system efficiency and equity in ASEAN: an empirical investigation.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sirinya KaikeawInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. sirinya-k@hotmail.com.
Sureeporn PunpuingInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Chalermpol ChamchanInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.
Pramote PrasartkulInstitute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThailand's Universal Health Coverage (UHC) has been achieved since 2002 when the entire population are covered by three main public health security schemes: (1) Civil Servant Medical Benefit Scheme (CSMBS); (2) Social Security Scheme (SSS); and (3) Universal Coverage Scheme (UCS). Citizens have access to healthcare services at all life stages and are protected from catastrophic expenditure and medical impoverishment. However, there are health inequalities in both health outcomes and access to healthcare among older Thais. This study aims to: (1) assess the degrees of socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes among the older Thai population during the period of Thailand's UHC implementation (2003-2019), and (2) explain socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes through decomposition of the contributions made by Thailand's UHC policy and other health determinants.

methodsData sets come from a four-year series of the National Health and Welfare Survey (HWS) between 2003 and 2019. The health outcome of interest was obtained from the Thai EQ-5D index. The Erreygers' concentration index (CI) was used to calculate the socioeconomic inequality in health outcomes. Multivariate methods were employed to decompose inequalities.

resultsFindings indicated Thai older adults (aged 50 and older) are healthier during the UHC implementation. Better health outcomes remain concentrated among the wealthier groups (pro-rich inequality). However, the degree of socioeconomic inequalities in health outcomes significantly declined by almost a factor-of-three (from CI = 0.061 in 2003 to CI = 0.024 in 2019) after the roll-out of the UHC. Decomposed results reported that Thailand's UHC, urban residence, and household wealth were major contributors in explaining pro-rich inequalities in health outcomes among Thai older adults.

conclusionsOlder persons in Thailand have better health while health inequalities between the rich and the poor have substantially decreased. However, there is inequalities in health outcomes within all three national health security schemes in Thailand. Minimizing differences between schemes continues to be a crucial cornerstone to tackling health inequalities among the older population. At the same time, making Thailand's UHC sustainable is necessary through preparing financial sustainability and developing health resources to better serve an ageing society.

Indexed as

Health InequitiesSoutheast Asian PeopleUniversal Health InsuranceAgedAged, 80 and overHealth ServicesHumansMiddle AgedSocioeconomic FactorsThailandDecomposition of concentration indexOlder personsSocioeconomic health inequalityThailandUHC

Identifiers

PMID37533003
PMCPMC10399069

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.