Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532868›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2023

[Rebound tonometry with sterilized probes].

Daniel M Handzel, C Ben Abdallah, H Habie, A Alani, W Sekundo

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The soft-shell technique in eyes with a shallow anterior chamber - a randomized trial on the influence of the ophthalmic viscosurgical device.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Comparative analysis of anterior chamber stability with a cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device versus the soft-shell technique.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel M Handzel, Fulda, Deutschland. dhandzel@augenaerzte-fulda.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5936-1826
C Ben AbdallahStandort "Augenärzte im Altstadt-Carree", Augenzentrum Osthessen, Dalbergstr. 22, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.
H HabieStandort "Augenärzte im Altstadt-Carree", Augenzentrum Osthessen, Dalbergstr. 22, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.
A AlaniStandort "Augenärzte im Altstadt-Carree", Augenzentrum Osthessen, Dalbergstr. 22, 36037, Fulda, Deutschland.
W SekundoAugenklinik, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Fulda University of Applied Sciences · DEPhilipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) opens up possibilities to investigate the influence of IOP on the stability of the eyeball during the performance of surgical maneuvers. Few techniques have been described, none of which are commercially available. This study investigated the use of sterilized probes for rebound tonometry, which could be used intraoperatively. MATERIAL AND

methodsTonometry was performed on 30 eyes using a noncontact tonometer and rebound tonometry with the iCare 100 and iCare 200 (iCare Finland Oy, Vantaa, Finland) in a sitting and in a supine position. When performing rebound tonometry probes from the package were used sequentially with sterilized probes. The comparability of sterilized and nonsterilized probes was investigated using different rebound tonometers and different settings.

resultsMeasurements on a sitting subject were comparable with sterilized and nonsterilized probes. Statistically significant comparability was also found in a supine position. Measurements with identically sterilized probes on identically positioned subjects were comparable with iCare 100 und iCare 200 (T2 vs. T4, p = 0.003 und T3 vs. T5 p < 0.001). The comparison of measurements of the original probe with the sterilized probe in a sitting and in a supine position were possible with statistical significance (p < 0.005). Measuring with the iCare 200 in a sitting position showed a slightly lower IOP with the sterilized probe with the difference being statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Single autoclaving does not alter the probes' ability to measure IOP.

conclusionThe use of probes which have been sterilized according to the regulations for other surgical instruments opens up new possibilities for the intraoperative measurement of IOP. This facilitates the use in scientific studies on surgical techniques. In the postoperative period the use of sterilized probes can reduce the risk of infection.

Indexed as

GlaucomaIntraocular PressureHumansManometryReproducibility of ResultsTonometry, OcularCataract surgeryIntraocular pressureIntraoperative tonometryRebound tonometry

Identifiers

PMID37532868
OpenAlexW4385480501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.