ArticleHeredity2023
Correction: Intragenomic rDNA variation-the product of concerted evolution, mutation, or something in between?
Article in Heredity, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Nuclear Ribosomal ITS1-5.8S rDNA-ITS2 Region as a Phylogenetic Marker forInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Impacts of ribosomal RNA sequence variation on gene expression and phenotype.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- Ribosome-associated proteins: unwRAPping ribosome heterogeneity in the twenty-first century.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025Review
- High-Resolution Melting Analysis for Differentiation ofMycobiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.