Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532795›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Close-kin mark-recapture informs critically endangered terrestrial mammal status.

Luke R Lloyd-Jones, Mark V Bravington, Kyle N Armstrong, Emma Lawrence, Pierre Feutry, Christopher M Todd, Annabel Dorrestein, Justin A Welbergen, John M Martin, Karrie Rose and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of close-kin mark-recapture to an American black bear population using harvest samples.Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Assessing differences among elasmobranch nurseries to aid conservation based on a genomics framework.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Luke R Lloyd-JonesCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Data61, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia. luke.lloyd-jones@csiro.au.
Mark V BravingtonCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Data61, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Kyle N ArmstrongEnvironment Institute, University of Adelaide, North Terrace, Adelaide, South Australia, 5005, Australia.
Emma LawrenceCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Data61, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Pierre FeutryCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Christopher M ToddThe Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, Australia.
Annabel DorresteinThe Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, Australia.
Justin A WelbergenThe Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, Australia.
John M MartinThe Hawkesbury Institute for the Environment, Western Sydney University, Richmond, NSW, Australia.
Karrie RoseAustralian Registry of Wildlife Health, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Bradleys Head Road, Mosman, NSW, 2088, Australia.
Jane HallAustralian Registry of Wildlife Health, Taronga Conservation Society Australia, Bradleys Head Road, Mosman, NSW, 2088, Australia.
David N PhalenSydney School of Veterinary Science, Faculty of Science, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
Isabel PetersSchool of Mathematics and Physics, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, 4072, Australia.
Shane M BaylisCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, TAS, 7000, Australia.
Nicholas A MacgregorParks Australia, Canberra, ACT, 2601, Australia.
David A WestcottLand and Water, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Atherton, QLD, 4883, Australia.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation · AUWestern Sydney University · AUData61 · AUTaronga Conservation Society Australia · AUThe University of Adelaide · AUThe University of Queensland · AUThe University of Sydney · AUUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable information on population size is fundamental to the management of threatened species. For wild species, mark-recapture methods are a cornerstone of abundance estimation. Here, we show the first application of the close-kin mark-recapture (CKMR) method to a terrestrial species of high conservation value; the Christmas Island flying-fox (CIFF). The CIFF is the island's last remaining native terrestrial mammal and was recently listed as critically endangered. CKMR is a powerful tool for estimating the demographic parameters central to CIFF management and circumvents the complications arising from the species' cryptic nature, mobility, and difficult-to-survey habitat. To this end, we used genetic data from 450 CIFFs captured between 2015 and 2019 to detect kin pairs. We implemented a novel CKMR model that estimates sex-specific abundance, trend, and mortality and accommodates observations from the kin-pair distribution of male reproductive skew and mate persistence. CKMR estimated CIFF total adult female abundance to be approximately 2050 individuals (95% CI (950, 4300)). We showed that on average only 23% of the adult male population contributed to annual reproduction and strong evidence for between-year mate fidelity, an observation not previously quantified for a Pteropus species in the wild. Critically, our population estimates provide the most robust understanding of the status of this critically endangered population, informing immediate and future conservation initiatives.

Indexed as

ChiropteraConservation of Natural ResourcesAnimalsEcosystemEndangered SpeciesFemaleHumansMaleMammalsPopulation Density

Identifiers

PMID37532795
PMCPMC10397353
OpenAlexW4385490369

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.