Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532773›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Duration and accuracy of automated stroke CT workflow with AI-supported intracranial large vessel occlusion detection.

Sander E Temmen, Marinus J Becks, Steven Schalekamp, Kicky G van Leeuwen, Frederick J A Meijer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sander E TemmenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 766, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marinus J BecksDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 766, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Steven SchalekampDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 766, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kicky G van LeeuwenDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 766, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Frederick J A MeijerDepartment of Medical Imaging, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 766, PO Box 9101, 6500HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. Anton.meijer@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Automation Platform (AP) is a software platform to support the workflow of radiologists and includes a stroke CT package with integrated artificial intelligence (AI) based tools. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the AP for the detection of intracranial large vessel occlusions (LVO) on conventional CT angiography (CTA), and the duration of CT processing in a cohort of acute stroke patients. The diagnostic performance for intracranial LVO detection on CTA by the AP was evaluated in a retrospective cohort of 100 acute stroke patients and compared to the diagnostic performance of five radiologists with different levels of experience. The reference standard was set by an independent neuroradiologist, with access to the readings of the different radiologists, clinical data, and follow-up. The data processing time of the AP for ICH detection on non-contrast CT, LVO detection on CTA, and the processing of CTP maps was assessed in a subset 60 patients of the retrospective cohort. This was compared to 13 radiologists, who were prospectively timed for the processing and reading of 21 stroke CTs. The AP showed shorter processing time of CTA (mean 60 versus 395 s) and CTP (mean 196 versus 243-349 s) as compared to radiologists, but showed lower sensitivity for LVO detection (sensitivity 77% of the AP vs mean sensitivity 87% of radiologists). If the AP would have been used as a stand-alone system, 1 ICA occlusion, 2 M1 occlusions and 8 M2 occlusions would have been missed, which would be eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. In conclusion, the AP showed shorter processing time of CTA and CTP as compared with radiologists, which illustrates the potential of the AP to speed-up the diagnostic work-up. However, its performance for LVO detection was lower as compared with radiologists, especially for M2 vessel occlusions.

Indexed as

Brain IschemiaStrokeArtificial IntelligenceCerebral AngiographyComputed Tomography AngiographyHumansRetrospective StudiesWorkflow

Identifiers

PMID37532773
PMCPMC10397283
OpenAlexW4385491788

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.