Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532742›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Testing a relational account of search templates in visual foraging.

Inga M Grössle, Anna Schubö, Jan Tünnermann

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. FoMo: A unifying theory of visual foraging.PLoS computational biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Inga M GrössleCognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0950-3742
Anna SchuböCognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-3274-1693
Jan TünnermannCognitive Neuroscience of Perception and Action, Department of Psychology, Philipps-University Marburg, Gutenbergstraße 18, 35032, Marburg, Germany. jan.tuennermann@uni-marburg.de.ORCID 0000-0003-1861-3115
Philipps University of Marburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Search templates guide human visual attention toward relevant targets. Templates are often seen as encoding exact target features, but recent studies suggest that templates rather contain "relational properties" (e.g., they facilitate "redder" stimuli instead of specific hues of red). Such relational guidance seems helpful in naturalistic searches where illumination or perspective renders exact feature values unreliable. So far relational guidance has only been demonstrated in rather artificial single-target search tasks with briefly flashed displays. Here, we investigate whether relational guidance also occurs when humans interact with the search environment for longer durations to collect multiple target elements. In a visual foraging task, participants searched for and collected multiple targets among distractors of different relationships to the target colour. Distractors whose colour differed from the environment in the same direction as the targets reduced foraging efficiency to the same amount as distractors whose colour matched the target colour. Distractors that differed by the same colour distance but in the opposite direction of the target colour did not reduce efficiency. These findings provide evidence that search templates encode relational target features in naturalistic search tasks and suggest that attention guidance based on relational features is a common mode in dynamic, real-world search environments.

Indexed as

Pattern Recognition, VisualVisual PerceptionHumansPhotic StimulationReaction TimeTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID37532742
PMCPMC10397186
OpenAlexW4385491904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.