Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532726›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Preoperative prediction of sinonasal papilloma by artificial intelligence using nasal video endoscopy: a retrospective study.

Ryosuke Yui, Masahiro Takahashi, Katsuhiko Noda, Kaname Yoshida, Rinko Sakurai, Shinya Ohira, Kazuhiro Omura, Nobuyoshi Otori, Kota Wada, Hiromi Kojima

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ryosuke YuiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro TakahashiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. takahashima@jikei.ac.jp.
Katsuhiko NodaSIOS Technology Inc., Minami-Azabu, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kaname YoshidaSIOS Technology Inc., Minami-Azabu, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Rinko SakuraiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Shinya OhiraDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Kazuhiro OmuraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Nobuyoshi OtoriDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Kota WadaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Toho University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi KojimaDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Jikei University School of Medicine · JPToho University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sinonasal inverted papilloma (IP) is at risk of recurrence and malignancy, and early diagnosis using nasal endoscopy is essential. We thus developed a diagnostic system using artificial intelligence (AI) to identify nasal sinus papilloma. Endoscopic surgery videos of 53 patients undergoing endoscopic sinus surgery were edited to train and evaluate deep neural network models and then a diagnostic system was developed. The correct diagnosis rate based on visual examination by otolaryngologists was also evaluated using the same videos and compared with that of the AI diagnostic system patients. Main outcomes evaluated included the percentage of correct diagnoses compared to AI diagnosis and the correct diagnosis rate for otolaryngologists based on years of practice experience. The diagnostic system had an area under the curve of 0.874, accuracy of 0.843, false positive rate of 0.124, and false negative rate of 0.191. The average correct diagnosis rate among otolaryngologists was 69.4%, indicating that the AI was highly accurate. Evidently, although the number of cases was small, a highly accurate diagnostic system was created. Future studies with larger samples to improve the accuracy of the system and expand the range of diseases that can be detected for more clinical applications are warranted.

Indexed as

Papilloma, InvertedParanasal Sinus NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceEndoscopyHumansNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37532726
PMCPMC10397257
OpenAlexW4385493537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.