Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532482›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2023

Comparison of conventional and cooled radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves versus sham procedure for patients with chronic knee pain: protocol for a multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (COGENIUS).

Thibaut Vanneste, Amy Belba, Sander van Kuijk, Merel Kimman, Johan Bellemans, Vincent Bonhomme, Micha Sommer, Pieter Emans, Patrik Vankrunkelsven, Katrien Tartaglia and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05407610 (Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency Treatment of the Genicular Nerves Versus Sham Procedure for Patients With Chronic Knee Pain), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05407610 narecruitingnot on this map

Comparison of Conventional and Cooled Radiofrequency Treatment of the Genicular Nerves Versus Sham Procedure for Patients With Chronic Knee Pain: a Multicentre, Double Blind, Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorZiekenhuis Oost-LimburgRan2022 to 2026Enrolled400ConditionsKnee Osteoarthritis, Persistent Postsurgical Pain, Chronic Knee PainArmsConventional Radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves, Cooled Radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves, Sham procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Thibaut VannesteDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium thibaut.vanneste@zol.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1920-8085
Amy BelbaDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Sander van KuijkDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2796-729X
Merel KimmanDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Johan BellemansFaculty of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Vincent BonhommeDepartment of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Liege University Hospital, Liege, Belgium.
Micha SommerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pieter EmansDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Patrik VankrunkelsvenDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Catholic University of Leuven Faculty of Medicine, Leuven, Belgium.
Katrien TartagliaClinical Trial Unit, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Jan Van ZundertDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Multidisciplinary Pain Center, Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg, Genk, Belgium.
Maastricht University · NLZiekenhuis Oost-Limburg · BEHasselt University · BEKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe prevalence of chronic knee pain is increasing. Osteoarthritis (OA) and persistent postsurgical pain (PPSP) are two important causes of knee pain. Chronic knee pain is primarily treated with medications, physiotherapy, life-style changes and intra-articular infiltrations. A radiofrequency treatment (RF) of the genicular nerves is a therapeutical option for refractory knee pain. This study investigates the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of conventional and cooled RF in patients suffering from chronic, therapy resistant, moderate to severe knee pain due to OA and PPSP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The COGENIUS trial is a double-blinded, randomised controlled trial with 2-year follow-up. Patients and outcome assessors are blinded. Patients will be recruited and treated in Belgium and the Netherlands. All PPSP after a total knee prothesis and OA patients (grades 2-4) will undergo a run-in period of 1-3 months where conservative treatment will be optimised. After the run-in period, 200 patient per group will be randomised to conventional RF, cooled RF or a sham procedure following a 2:2:1 ratio. The analysis will include a comparison of the effectiveness of each RF treatment with the sham procedure and secondarily between conventional and cooled RF. All comparisons will be made for each indication separately. The primary outcome is the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index score at 6 months. Other outcomes include knee pain, physical functionality, health-related quality of life, emotional health, medication use, healthcare and societal cost and adverse events up to 24 months postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the University of Antwerp (Number Project ID 3069-Edge 002190-BUN B3002022000025), the Ethics committee of Maastricht University (Number NL80503.068.22-METC22-023) and the Ethics committee of all participating hospitals. Results of the study will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05407610.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeHumansKnee JointMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative PainQuality of LifeRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment Outcomechronic painkneepain management

Identifiers

PMID37532482
PMCPMC10401223
OpenAlexW4385480603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.