Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532473›Full record

ArticleBMJ open respiratory research2023

Deep learning with test-time augmentation for radial endobronchial ultrasound image differentiation: a multicentre verification study.

Kai-Lun Yu, Yi-Shiuan Tseng, Han-Ching Yang, Chia-Jung Liu, Po-Chih Kuo, Meng-Rui Lee, Chun-Ta Huang, Lu-Cheng Kuo, Jann-Yuan Wang, Chao-Chi Ho and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open respiratory research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Artificial Intelligence in Interventional Pulmonology.Therapeutic advances in pulmonary and critical care medicine
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kai-Lun YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Yi-Shiuan TsengDepartment of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Han-Ching YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Chia-Jung LiuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.
Po-Chih Kuo *Department of Computer Science, National Tsing Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan leemr@ntu.edu.tw kuopc@cs.nthu.edu.tw.
Meng-Rui Lee *Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan leemr@ntu.edu.tw kuopc@cs.nthu.edu.tw.
Chun-Ta HuangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Lu-Cheng KuoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jann-Yuan WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chao-Chi HoDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jin-Yuan ShihGraduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chong-Jen YuDepartment of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the importance of radial endobronchial ultrasound (rEBUS) in transbronchial biopsy, researchers have yet to apply artificial intelligence to the analysis of rEBUS images. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study developed a convolutional neural network (CNN) to differentiate between malignant and benign tumours in rEBUS images. This study retrospectively collected rEBUS images from medical centres in Taiwan, including 769 from National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu Hospital for model training (615 images) and internal validation (154 images) as well as 300 from National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH-TPE) and 92 images were obtained from National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Biomedical Park Hospital (NTUH-BIO) for external validation. Further assessments of the model were performed using image augmentation in the training phase and test-time augmentation (TTA).

resultsUsing the internal validation dataset, the results were as follows: area under the curve (AUC) (0.88 (95% CI 0.83 to 0.92)), sensitivity (0.80 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.88)), specificity (0.75 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.83)). Using the NTUH-TPE external validation dataset, the results were as follows: AUC (0.76 (95% CI 0.71 to 0.80)), sensitivity (0.58 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.65)), specificity (0.92 (95% CI 0.88 to 0.97)). Using the NTUH-BIO external validation dataset, the results were as follows: AUC (0.72 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.82)), sensitivity (0.71 (95% CI 0.55 to 0.86)), specificity (0.76 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.87)). After fine-tuning, the AUC values for the external validation cohorts were as follows: NTUH-TPE (0.78) and NTUH-BIO (0.82). Our findings also demonstrated the feasibility of the model in differentiating between lung cancer subtypes, as indicated by the following AUC values: adenocarcinoma (0.70; 95% CI 0.64 to 0.76), squamous cell carcinoma (0.64; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.74) and small cell lung cancer (0.52; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.72).

conclusionsOur results demonstrate the feasibility of the proposed CNN-based algorithm in differentiating between malignant and benign lesions in rEBUS images.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsArtificial IntelligenceHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective Studiesbronchoscopylung cancer

Identifiers

PMID37532473
PMCPMC10401203

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.