Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37532289›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2023

Cost analysis of archives in the pathology laboratories: from safety to management.

Albino Eccher, Angelo Paolo Dei Tos, Aldo Scarpa, Vincenzo L'Imperio, Enrico Munari, Giancarlo Troncone, Antonio Giuseppe Naccarato, Davide Seminati, Fabio Pagni

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Digital counting of tissue cells for molecular analysis: the QuANTUM pipeline.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. On image search in histopathology.Journal of pathology informatics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Cutting-edge technology and automation in the pathology laboratory.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Optimizing Re-staining Techniques for the Restoration of Faded Hematoxylin and Eosin-stained Histopathology Slides: A Comparative Study.The journal of histochemistry and cytochemistry : official journal of the Histochemistry Society
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Albino EccherDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Angelo Paolo Dei TosDepartment of Medicine-DIMED, University of Padua, Padova, Italy.
Aldo ScarpaDepartment of Diagnostics and Public Health, Università degli Studi di Verona, Verona, Italy.
Vincenzo L'ImperioDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9284-2998
Enrico MunariDepartment of Pathology, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Giancarlo TronconePublic Health, University of Naples Federico II School of Medicine and Surgery, Napoli, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1630-5805
Antonio Giuseppe NaccaratoDepartment of New Technologies and Translational Research, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Davide SeminatiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2166-301X
Fabio PagniDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Pathology, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milano, Italy fabio.pagni@unimib.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9625-1637
University of Milano-Bicocca · ITUniversity of Verona · ITFederico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Brescia · ITUniversity of Padua · ITUniversity of Pisa · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

contextDespite the reluctance to invest and the challenging estimation of necessary supporting costs, optimising the archives seems to be one of the hottest topics in the future management of the pathology laboratories. Historically, archives were only partially designed to securely store and organise tissue specimens, and tracking systems were often flawed, posing significant risks to patients' health and legal ramifications for pathologists.

objectiveThe current review explores the available data from the literature on archives' management in pathology, including comprehensive business plans, structure setup, outfit, inventories, ongoing conservation and functional charges. DATA SOURCES: Electronic searches in PubMed-MEDLINE and Embase were made to extract pertinent articles from the literature. Works about the archiving process and storage were included and analysed to extract information. Prepublication servers were ignored. Italian Institutional Regional databases for public competitive bidding processes were queried too.

conclusionsA new emergent feeling in the pathology laboratory is growing for archives management; the digital pathology era is a great opportunity to apply innovation to tracking systems and samples preservation. The main aim is a critical evaluation of the return of investment in developing automatic and tracked archiving processes for improving not only quality, efficacy and efficiency of the labs but also patients' healthcare.

Indexed as

ArchivesLaboratoriesCosts and Cost AnalysisHumansItalyCosts and Cost AnalysisMANAGEMENTSAFETY

Identifiers

PMID37532289
PMCPMC10511949
OpenAlexW4385489953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.