Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37531657›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of infectious diseases2024

A Phase 2 Extension Study Evaluating the Immunogenicity, Safety, and Tolerability of 3 or 4 Doses of a Clostridioides difficile Vaccine in Healthy US Adults Aged 65 to 85 Years.

Shon Remich, Nicholas Kitchin, James Peterson, Ping Li, Michael W Pride, Linda Brock, Annaliesa S Anderson, William C Gruber, Kathrin U Jansen, Stephen P Lockhart and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of infectious diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02561195 (A PHASE 2, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, RANDOMIZED, OBSERVER-BLINDED STUDY TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY, TOLERABILITY, AND IMMUNOGENICITY OF TWO 3-DOSE REGIMENS OF A CLOSTRIDIUM DIFFICILE VACCINE IN HEALTHY ADULTS AGED 65 TO 85 YEARS), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02561195 phase2completednot on this map

A phase 2, placebo-controlled, randomized, observer-blinded study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of two 3-dose regimens of a clostridium difficile vaccine in healthy adults aged 65 to 85 years

TypeinterventionalSponsorPfizerRan2015 to 2020Enrolled300ConditionsClostridium Difficile Associated DiseaseArmsClostridium difficile Vaccine, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Mechanisms ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Review
  8. Gene Expression Dysregulation in Whole Blood of Patients withInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Toxins · 2024
    Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shon RemichPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Nicholas KitchinPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Hurley, United Kingdom.
James PetersonFoothill Family Clinic, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Ping LiPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Collegeville, Pennsylvania.
Michael W PridePfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York.
Linda BrockPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York.
Annaliesa S AndersonPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York.
William C GruberPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York.
Kathrin U JansenPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Pearl River, New York.
Stephen P LockhartPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Chris WebberPfizer Vaccine Research and Development, Hurley, United Kingdom.
Pfizer (United States) · USPfizer (United Kingdom) · GBFoothill Family Clinic · US

Funding

Pfizer Inc
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis phase 2 extension explored the long-term antibody persistence of an investigational Clostridioides difficile vaccine and the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of dose 4 approximately 12 months post-dose 3.

methodsOne year post-dose 3, healthy US 65- to 85-year-olds (N = 300) were randomized to dose 4 of vaccine at previously received antigen levels (100 or 200 μg) or placebo. Assessments included safety and percentages of participants achieving neutralizing antibody titers above prespecified thresholds (≥219 and ≥2586 neutralization units/mL for toxins A and B, respectively).

resultsIn participants previously given three 200-µg doses and placebo in the extension, toxin A and B neutralizing antibodies were above prevaccination levels 48 months post-dose 3 (36 months after placebo); 24.0% and 26.0% had toxin A and B antibodies at or above prespecified thresholds, respectively. Neutralizing antibodies increased post-dose 4 (12 months post-dose 3) and persisted to 36 months post-dose 4. Thirty days post-dose 4, all participants had toxin A and 86.5% to 100% had toxin B titers at or above prespecified thresholds. Local reactions were more frequent in vaccine recipients. Systemic and adverse event frequencies were similar across groups.

conclusionsC difficile vaccine immune responses persisted 48 months post-dose 3. Dose 4 was immunogenic and well tolerated, supporting continued development. Clinical Trials Registration. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02561195.

Indexed as

Clostridioides difficileAdultAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationBacterial VaccinesDouble-Blind MethodHumansImmunogenicity, VaccineAntibodies, BacterialAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralBacterial VaccinesadultsClostridioides difficile infectionnosocomial diarrheatoxoid vaccineUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37531657
PMCPMC10873164
OpenAlexW4385514962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.