ArticleEuropean journal of neurology2024
Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.
Article in European journal of neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Clinical Characteristics and Treatment Management of Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis: A Systematic Review of the Literature.Muscle & nerve · 2026Pooled it
- Double-seronegative myasthenia gravis: clinical characteristics, treatment, and outcomes - a systematic review of case reports and case series.BMC neurology · 2026Pooled it
- Measuring the effect of rozanolixizumab using the Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index: analyses from the randomized phase 3 MycarinG study.Journal of neurology · 2025Trial
- A case report of sequential efgartigimod and rituximab treatment for tSNMG.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Association between antibody status and exacerbation in patients with myasthenia gravis who achieved minimal manifestation or better status.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- Double seronegative myasthenia gravis and mimics: a retrospective cross-sectional study by two tertiary centers in the Southern Italy.Journal of neurology · 2025Article
- The burden of disease in seronegative myasthenia gravis: a patient-centered perspective.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Observational
- AI-based thematic exploration to understand patients with myasthenia gravis by serological subtype.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Open-label study of efgartigimod in seronegative myasthenia gravis.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2025Article
- HLA Class I and II Alleles in Anti-Acetylcholine Receptor Antibodies Positive and Double-Seronegative Myasthenia Gravis Patients of Romanian Descent.Neurology international · 2024Article
- Rethinking the diagnosis of double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Reply to letter in response to Rethinking the diagnosis of double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
- Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes in patients with double-seronegative myasthenia gravis.European journal of neurology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDouble-seronegative myasthenia gravis (dSNMG) is defined as myasthenia gravis (MG) without detectable or low affinity antibodies to acetylcholine receptor (AChR) and muscle-specific kinase (MuSK). There are limited data on detailed clinical features and outcomes after treatment in dSNMG patients. The aim was to describe the clinical characteristics and outcomes in dSNMG patients based on MG scales.
methodsA retrospective study was performed of patients diagnosed with MG who had negative AChR or MuSK antibodies and they were compared with an AChR-positive MG cohort. Correlations were made with data from the first and last clinic visits, between demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment and disease severity, based on the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America category, Myasthenia Gravis Impairment Index (MGII), Patient Acceptable Symptom State and simple single question (SSQ).
resultsEighty patients met the inclusion criteria for dSNMG. The baseline MGII and SSQ scores in the dSNMG cohort showed no significant differences from the AChR group (p = 0.94 and p = 0.46). The dSNMG cohort MGII and SSQ scores improved significantly at the last clinical evaluation (p = 0.001 and p = 0.047). The MGII improvement in the AChR cohort was significantly better (p = 0.003).
conclusionsThe initial severity of dSNMG based on clinical scores is similar to antibody-positive MG patients. There is significant clinical improvement in dSNMG patients after therapy, measured in the last clinical evaluation. This supports an immune pathophysiology of many dSNMG patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.