Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37531402›Full record

ArticleNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2024

The Impact of High or Low Doses of Nicotine in a Mouse Model of Vapor Self-Administration.

Skylar Y Cooper, Nathan A Olszewski, Samuel Tetteh-Quarshie, Sean P Hill, Saaman Ghodsi, Astrid González-Castro, Clay V Willis, Brandon J Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Synthetic cooling agents enhance nicotine reinforcement and mesolimbic dopamine signaling.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The inside story: Interoceptive Pavlovian conditioning with the nicotine stimulus.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Skylar Y CooperDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0646-6488
Nathan A OlszewskiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Samuel Tetteh-QuarshieDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Sean P HillDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Saaman GhodsiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Astrid González-CastroDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Clay V WillisDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Brandon J HendersonDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0381-028X

Funding

Electronic cigarettes, adolescents, and changes in neurobiologyR01DA050717 · NIDA · MARSHALL UNIVERSITY · PI HENDERSON, BRANDON JARROD · 2021 to 2025
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA050717
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA wide variety of nicotine concentrations and formulations are available to users of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). This is increasingly true when considering the many flavors available with ENDS products. To date, there have been few preclinical investigations into the impact of nicotine doses, with and without flavors, on vaping-related behaviors. This present study evaluated how nicotine concentrations relevant to tank-based and pod-based ENDS, with and without flavors, impact reinforcement-related behavior in a mouse model. AIMS AND

methodsAdult male and female C57/BL6J mice were used in vapor-inhalation self-administration assays. Mice were assigned e-liquids containing 6 mg/mL or 60 mg/mL nicotine. Additional mice were assigned these nicotine doses with green apple or menthol flavorants. Mice were trained on fixed-ratio 1 for 10, 2-hour sessions, then five sessions at FR3, three progressive ratio sessions, and two FR3 sessions.

resultsWe observed male mice exhibited higher reinforcement-related behavior to menthol-flavored 6 mg/mL nicotine when compared to female mice. Males were only observed to have a menthol-induced enhancement of self-administration at 6 mg/mL nicotine and not 60 mg/mL nicotine. However, female mice exhibited significant menthol-induced increases in reinforcement-related behaviors with 60 mg/mL nicotine.

conclusionsThese data provide evidence that males and females exhibit different dose sensitivities to nicotine. These sex-dependent differences in nicotine sensitivity also indicate that flavor-induced enhancement in nicotine intake is dependent on the different doses for each sex. IMPLICATIONS: There has been much discussion recently regarding the impact of flavors on vaping-related behavior. Our current study may support prior investigations that suggest flavors enhance the palatability of nicotine-containing products. However, this current study provides evidence that males and females exhibit different sensitivities to nicotine.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsTobacco ProductsVapingAnimalsFemaleFlavoring AgentsMaleMentholMiceNicotineReinforcement, PsychologyFlavoring AgentsMentholNicotine

Identifiers

PMID37531402
PMCPMC10882436

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.