Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37531397›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

#chatsafe 2.0. updated guidelines to support young people to communicate safely online about self-harm and suicide: A Delphi expert consensus study.

Jo Robinson, Pinar Thorn, Samuel McKay, Laura Hemming, Rikki Battersby-Coulter, Charlie Cooper, Maria Veresova, Angela Li, Nicola Reavley, Simon Rice and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract readConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Developing Language and Image Use Guidance for Communicating About Suicide, Mental Health Concerns and Alcohol and Other Drug Concerns: An Australian Delphi Study.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2026
    Article
  2. The #chatsafe Youth Participation Model: Evaluating Participatory Workshops Involving Young People in the Design of Suicide Prevention Initiatives.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Reducing the 'Silence Between Sessions': A Qualitative Study on Youth and Professionals' Perspectives on Digital Tools for Suicide Prevention.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lived Experience Participation in Suicide Prevention Activities in Australia, a Scoping Review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Jo RobinsonOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5652-918X
Pinar ThornOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Samuel McKayOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Laura HemmingOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Rikki Battersby-CoulterOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Charlie CooperOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4123-3778
Maria VeresovaOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Angela LiOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1358-5701
Nicola ReavleyCentre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5513-8291
Simon RiceOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Michelle LamblinOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Jane PirkisCentre for Mental Health, School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Dan ReidenbergSuicide Awareness Voices of Education, Bloomington, Minnesota, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0749-1802
Vicki HarrisonDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Jaelea SkehanCollege of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.
Louise La SalaOrygen, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
The University of Melbourne · AUAustralian National University · AUHealth Awareness (United States) · USStanford University · USUniversity of Newcastle Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionYoung people use social media to communicate about self-harm and suicide and this is associated with both potential risks and protective effects. The #chatsafe guidelines were originally developed in 2018 to equip young people to communicate safely online about suicide. They were shown to be safe, acceptable, and beneficial; however, they do not provide guidance on self-harm, and social media is constantly evolving. This study aimed to update the #chatsafe guidelines to reflect new evidence and current social media affordances, and to include guidance on self-harm.

methodsA Delphi expert consensus study was conducted, comprising six stages: 1) A systematic search of peer-reviewed and grey literature; 2) A series of roundtables with key stakeholders including social media companies, policymakers, and young people; 3) Questionnaire development; 4) Expert panel formation; 5) Data collection and analysis; and 6) Guideline development.

resultsA total of 191 items were included in the new #chatsafe guidelines. These were organised into eight themes, which became the overarching sections of the guidelines: 1) General tips; 2) Creating self-harm and suicide content; 3) Consuming self-harm and suicide content; 4) Livestreams of self-harm and suicide acts; 4) Self-harm and suicide games, pacts, and hoaxes; 6) Self-harm and suicide communities; 7) Bereavement and communicating about someone who has died by suicide; and 8) Guidance for influencers. DISCUSSION: The new guidelines include updated and new information on online communication about self-harm, livestreams, games, pacts, and hoaxes, as well as guidance for influencers. They will be disseminated via a national social media campaign and supported by a series of adult-facing resources. Given the acceptability of the original guidelines and the ubiquitous use of social media by young people, it is hoped that the new guidelines will be a useful resource for young people and adults alike, both in Australia and worldwide.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicSelf-Injurious BehaviorSuicideAdolescentAdultBereavementConsensusDelphi TechniqueHumansSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID37531397
PMCPMC10395901
OpenAlexW4385482326

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.