ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023
XGDAG: explainable gene-disease associations via graph neural networks.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- VITAGRAPH: building a knowledge graph for biologically relevant learning tasks.Scientific data · 2026Article
- A multi-view feature fusion framework with interpretable graph convolution for predicting microbe-drug associations.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- DeepDisSNP: Predicting disease-associated SNPs by representation learning on disease and SNP linkage disequilibrium networks.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026Article
- Genomics of drug target prioritization for complex diseases.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer.Nature methods · 2026Review
- Cross-modal embedding integrator for disease-gene/protein association prediction using a multi-head attention mechanism.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2024Article
- CSGDN: contrastive signed graph diffusion network for predicting crop gene-phenotype associations.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Computational strategies for cross-species knowledge transfer and translational biomedicine.ArXiv · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationDisease gene prioritization consists in identifying genes that are likely to be involved in the mechanisms of a given disease, providing a ranking of such genes. Recently, the research community has used computational methods to uncover unknown gene-disease associations; these methods range from combinatorial to machine learning-based approaches. In particular, during the last years, approaches based on deep learning have provided superior results compared to more traditional ones. Yet, the problem with these is their inherent black-box structure, which prevents interpretability.
resultsWe propose a new methodology for disease gene discovery, which leverages graph-structured data using graph neural networks (GNNs) along with an explainability phase for determining the ranking of candidate genes and understanding the model's output. Our approach is based on a positive-unlabeled learning strategy, which outperforms existing gene discovery methods by exploiting GNNs in a non-black-box fashion. Our methodology is effective even in scenarios where a large number of associated genes need to be retrieved, in which gene prioritization methods often tend to lose their reliability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of XGDAG is available on GitHub at: https://github.com/GiDeCarlo/XGDAG. The data underlying this article are available at: https://www.disgenet.org/, https://thebiogrid.org/, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004120.s003, and https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004120.s004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.