Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37531043›Full record

Trial reportJournal of robotic surgery2023

Home practice for robotic surgery: a randomized controlled trial of a low-cost simulation model.

Rachel K Wile, Riley Brian, Natalie Rodriguez, Hueylan Chern, Jason Cruff, Patricia S O'Sullivan

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07618429 (Control Location Using Two Commands), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07618429 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Control Location Using Two Commands: Hand Versus Foot, Workload and Accuracy Response Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Robotic Surgery Simulation

TypeinterventionalSponsorPrince of Songkla UniversityRan2026 to 2026Enrolled86ConditionsNo Disease or Condition is Being Studied, Surgical Procedures, Minimally InvasiveArmsHand Clutch, Foot Clutch
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Hands-on Distance Simulation of Technical Skills: A Systematic Review.Simulation in healthcare : journal of the Society for Simulation in Healthcare · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Asynchronous Technical Feedback: A Workshop for Training Surgical Instructors.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel K WileSchool of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, 533 Parnassus Ave, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA. rachel.wile@ucsf.edu.
Riley BrianDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Natalie RodriguezDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Hueylan ChernDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.
Jason CruffDepartment of Obstetrics/Gynecology-Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery, Marshfield Clinic Health System, Marshfield, WI, 54449, USA.
Patricia S O'SullivanDepartment of Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Avenue, S-321, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-operative simulated practice allows trainees to learn robotic surgery outside the operating room without risking patient safety. While simulation practice has shown efficacy, simulators are expensive and frequently inaccessible. Cruff (J Surg Educ 78(2): 379-381, 2021) described a low-cost simulation model to learn hand movements for robotic surgery. Our study evaluates whether practice with low-cost home simulation models can improve trainee performance on robotic surgery simulators. Home simulation kits were adapted from those described by Cruff (J Surg Educ 78(2): 379-381, 2021). Hand controllers were modified to mimic the master tool manipulators (MTMs) on the da Vinci Skills Simulator (dVSS). Medical students completed two da Vinci exercises: Sea Spikes 1 (SS1) and Big Dipper Needle Driving (BDND). They were subsequently assigned to either receive a home simulation kit or not. Students returned two weeks later and repeated SS1 and BDND. Overall score, economy of motion, time to completion, and penalty subtotal were collected, and analyses of covariance were performed. Semi-structured interviews assessed student perceptions of the robotic simulation experience. Thirty-three medical students entered the study. Twenty-nine completed both sessions. The difference in score improvement between the experimental and control groups was not significant. In interviews, students provided suggestions to increase fidelity and usefulness of low-cost robotic home simulation. Low-cost home simulation models did not improve student performance on dVSS after two weeks of at-home practice. Interview data highlighted areas to focus future simulation efforts. Ongoing work is necessary to develop low-cost solutions to facilitate practice for robotic surgery and foster more inclusive and accessible surgical education.

Indexed as

RoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSimulation TrainingStudents, MedicalClinical CompetenceComputer SimulationHumansda Vinci skills simulatorHome simulation modelRobotic surgeryRobotic surgery simulationSimNowSurgical education

Identifiers

PMID37531043
PMCPMC10492874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.