Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530994›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgical oncology2023

Lymph Node Positivity: Indication for Preoperative MRI?

Kaitlyn Kennard, Irene Israel, Ariana Naaseh, Rimpi Saini, Kelly Rajapakse, Julia Kirsten, Ami Trivedi, Jade Tao, Jingqin Luo, Tabassum Ahmad and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kaitlyn KennardWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA. Kaitlyn.kennard@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9644-9758
Irene IsraelWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ariana NaasehWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Rimpi SainiWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Kelly RajapakseWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Julia KirstenWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Ami TrivediWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jade TaoWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jingqin LuoWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tabassum AhmadWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Julie MargenthalerWashington University St. Louis, Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe purpose was to determine what factors help predict benefit from preoperative MRI.

methodsWe conducted an IRB approved retrospective review of patients with breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI (2018-2021). Patients were divided into a cohort of no new disease detected on MRI versus new disease detected.

resultsOf 420 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer who underwent preoperative MRI, 17% had new multicentric, multifocal, or contralateral disease detected. There was no difference between the two cohorts for age (p = 0.23), race (p = 0.45), family history (p = 0.47), breast density (p = 0.14), or hormone status (p = 0.90). In multivariate analysis, age (p = 0.61, OR 0.99), race (p = 0.58, OR 1.26), family history (p = 0.54, OR 0.82), breast density (p = 0.83, OR 0.87), grade (p = 0.87, OR 1.09), tumor size (p = 0.37, OR 0.92), and use of neoadjuvant therapy (p = 0.41, OR 0.72) were not predictive of detection of additional new disease. Presence of positive nodes on ultrasound or mammogram was associated with new or multifocal disease on MRI (p = 0.0005, OR 3.48). Pre-MRI positive nodes increased the likelihood of detection of new disease (p = 0.0002, OR 3.04). Preoperative MRI resulted in more extensive surgery than indicated for 22.2% of the no new disease detected cohort and 6.9% of the new multicentric disease cohort (p < 0.001).

conclusionsPatients with nodal disease detected in their evaluation are more likely to have new multifocal, multicentric, or contralateral disease detected on MRI. The use of preoperative MRI may be particularly helpful in patients with node-positive disease in identifying additional disease that would alter surgical management.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsFemaleHumansLymph NodesMagnetic Resonance ImagingMammographyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID37530994
OpenAlexW4385476669

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.