Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530991›Full record

ArticleThe ultrasound journal2023

Evaluation of commercially available point-of-care ultrasound for automated optic nerve sheath measurement.

Brad T Moore, Tom Osika, Steven Satterly, Shreyansh Shah, Tim Thirion, Spencer Hampton, Stephen Aylward, Sean Montgomery

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The ultrasound journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brad T MooreMedical Computing, Kitware, Inc, Carrboro, NC, USA. brad.moore@kitware.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4322-8841
Tom OsikaMedical Computing, Kitware, Inc, Carrboro, NC, USA.
Steven SatterlySurgical Critical Care, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Shreyansh ShahTrauma, Acute, and Critical Care Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Tim ThirionMedical Computing, Kitware, Inc, Carrboro, NC, USA.
Spencer HamptonDuke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Stephen AylwardMedical Computing, Kitware, Inc, Carrboro, NC, USA.
Sean MontgomeryNeurocritical Care, Duke University Health System, Durham, NC, USA.
Duke University Health System · USKitware (United States) · US

Funding

U.S. Department of Defense and Medical Enterprise Technology Consortium W81XWH-15-9-0001/W81XWH-19-9-0015/19-08-MuLTI-0079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeasurement of the optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) via ultrasonography has been proposed as a non-invasive metric of intracranial pressure that may be employed during in-field patient triage. However, first responders are not typically trained to conduct sonographic exams and/or do not have access to an expensive ultrasound device. Therefore, for successful deployment of ONSD measurement in-field, we believe that first responders must have access to low-cost, portable ultrasound and be assisted by artificial intelligence (AI) systems that can automatically interpret the optic nerve sheath ultrasound scan. We examine the suitability of five commercially available, low-cost, portable ultrasound devices that can be combined with future artificial intelligence algorithms to reduce the training required for and cost of in-field optic nerve sheath diameter measurement. This paper is focused on the quality of the images generated by these low-cost probes. We report results of a clinician preference survey and compare with a lab analysis of three quantitative image quality metrics across devices. We also examine the suitability of the devices in a hypothetical far-forward deployment using operators unskilled in ultrasound, with the assumption of a future onboard AI video interpreter.

resultsWe find statistically significant differences in clinician ranking of the devices in the following categories: "Image Quality", "Ease of Acquisition", "Software", and "Overall ONSD". We show differences in signal-to-noise ratio, generalized contrast-to-noise ratio, point-spread function across the devices. These differences in image quality result in a statistically significant difference in manual ONSD measurement. Finally, we show that sufficiently wide transducers can capture the optic nerve sheath during blind (no visible B-mode) scans performed by operators unskilled in sonography.

conclusionsUltrasound of the optic nerve sheath has the potential to be a convenient, non-invasive, point-of-injury or triage measure for elevated intracranial pressure in cases of traumatic brain injury. When transducer width is sufficient, briefly trained operators may obtain video sequences of the optic nerve sheath without guidance. This data suggest that unskilled operators are able to achieve the images needed for AI interpretation. However, we also show that image quality differences between ultrasound probes may influence manual ONSD measurements.

Indexed as

Image analysisIntracranial pressureOcular ultrasoundOptic nerve sheathPoint-of-care ultrasoundTraumatic brain injuryUltrasoundUltrasound quality assurance

Identifiers

PMID37530991
PMCPMC10397168
OpenAlexW4385476852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.