Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530945›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2023

Outcome of glioblastoma patients after intensive care unit admission with invasive mechanical ventilation: a multicenter analysis.

Bernhard Neumann, Julia Onken, Nicole König, Henning Stetefeld, Sebastian Luger, Anna-Luisa Luger, Felix Schlachetzki, Ralf Linker, Peter Hau, Elisabeth Bumes

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Bernhard NeumannDepartment of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8254-8616
Julia OnkenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität Zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2859-4395
Nicole KönigDepartment of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Henning StetefeldDepartment of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-2145
Sebastian LugerDepartment of Neurology, RKH Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Ludwigsburg, Germany.
Anna-Luisa LugerDepartment of Neurology, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-3694
Felix SchlachetzkiDepartment of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Ralf LinkerDepartment of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.
Peter HauDepartment of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3894-5053
Elisabeth BumesDepartment of Neurology, Regensburg University Hospital, Regensburg, Germany. elisabeth.bumes@ukr.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6915-3206
University Hospital Regensburg · DEGoethe University Frankfurt · DEHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DEUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePatients with glioblastoma are exposed to severe symptoms and organs failures (e.g., coma or acute respiratory failure), that may require intensive care unit (ICU) admission and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). However, only limited data are available concerning the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma receiving IMV. We sought to describe the reasons for ICU admission, and outcomes of patients with glioblastoma requiring IMV for unplanned critical complications.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, four certified interdisciplinary brain tumor centers performed a retrospective review of their electronic data systems. All patients with glioblastoma admitted to an in-house ICU and receiving IMV between January 2015 and December 2019 were included. Clinical and prognostic factors as well as relevant outcome parameters were evaluated by group comparisons and Kaplan Meier survival curves.

resultsWe identified 33 glioblastoma patients with a duration of IMV of 9.2 ± 9.4 days. Main reasons for ICU admission were infection (n = 12; 34.3%) including 3 cases of Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia, status epilepticus (31.4%) and elevated intracranial pressure (22.9%). In-hospital mortality reached 60.6%. Younger age, low number of IMV days, better Karnofsky Performance Status Scale before admission and elevated intracranial pressure as cause of ICU admission were associated with positive prognostic outcome.

conclusionWe conclude that less than 50% of patients with glioblastoma have a favorable short-term outcome when unplanned ICU treatment with IMV is required. Our data mandate a careful therapy guidance and frequent reassessment of goals during ICU stay.

Indexed as

GlioblastomaRespiration, ArtificialHospitalizationHumansIntensive Care UnitsRetrospective StudiesGlioblastomaIntensive care unitInvasive mechanical ventilationOutcome

Identifiers

PMID37530945
PMCPMC10462561
OpenAlexW4385476764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.