Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530858›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2023

Application of prolonged submental perforator flap to repair the postoperative defect of upper airway malignancy.

Hongzhi Ma, Qi Zhong, Lizhen Hou, Ling Feng, Shizhi He, Meng Lian, Yanming Zhao, Ru Wang, Jugao Fang

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Hongzhi MaDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qi ZhongDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Lizhen HouDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ling FengDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Shizhi HeDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Meng LianDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Yanming ZhaoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Ru WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China.
Jugao FangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, 1 Dong Jiao Min Xiang, Eastern District, Beijing, 100730, China. fangjugao@163.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2109-0061
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore the feasibility of making a submental perforator flap distal to the connecting line between the mastoid and the sternoclavicular joint under the guidance of neck-enhanced CT and repairing the postoperative defect of upper airway malignancy. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study retrospectively analysed 19 cases of upper airway malignant tumours treated in our department from January 2021 to September 2022, including 17 males and 2 females, aged 43-70 years. SITE OF LESIONS: 15 cases were in the laryngopharynx, 2 cases in the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus and 2 cases on the soft palate. All the lesions were malignant and at stages T SURGICAL

methodThe extended submental perforator flap (size 22-15 × 6-7 cm) was prefabricated distal to the connecting line between the mastoid and the sternoclavicular joint. After tumour resection, the flap was used to repair the postoperative defect. Fifteen cases of laryngopharyngeal malignant tumours were repaired using the extended submental perforator flap with the vascular pedicle located on the opposite side of the tumour body. Two cases of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus tumours were repaired using the extended submental perforator flap combined with the temporalis muscle flap. The soft palate was completely removed in two patients with soft palate cancer and repaired using the folded extended submental perforator flap.

resultsBefore the surgery, the reflux vein was observed by neck-enhanced CT, including 12 cases returning to the internal jugular vein and 7 cases to the external jugular vein. All 19 cases in which flaps were used survived, and 1 case had a postoperative infection. All the patients had nasal feeding removed after surgery. The tracheal cannula was removed from the patients with laryngeal preservation, and the pronunciation was satisfactory. Among them, patients with soft palate cancer repair had mild nasal reflux symptoms with smooth breathing. During the follow-up period of 4-24 months, 18 patients had no tumour recurrence or metastasis, and 1 patient had cervical lymph node metastasis.

conclusionsThis study highlights the use of a submental perforator flap distal to the connecting line between the mastoid and the sternoclavicular joint to repair postoperative defects for upper airway malignancy as an innovative surgical approach that provides more tissue and good arteriovenous blood supply to adjacent sites. This method has high clinical value and provides an effective option for repairing postoperative defects of upper airway malignancy.

Indexed as

Palatal NeoplasmsPerforator FlapPlastic Surgery ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSkin TransplantationTreatment OutcomeCTExtended submental perforator flapHead and neck tumourRepairUpper airway

Identifiers

PMID37530858
PMCPMC10620253
OpenAlexW4385476358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.