Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530849›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2024

A deep learning approach to investigate the filtration bleb functionality after glaucoma surgery: a preliminary study.

Leonardo Mastropasqua, Luca Agnifili, Lorenza Brescia, Michele Figus, Chiara Posarelli, Francesco Oddone, Sara Giammaria, Matteo Sacchi, Marco Pavan, Dante Degli Innocenti and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Leonardo Mastropasqua *Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini Snc, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Luca Agnifili *Ophthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini Snc, 66100, Chieti, Italy. l.agnifili@unich.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1625-6305
Lorenza BresciaOphthalmology Clinic, Department of Medicine and Ageing Science, University "G. D'Annunzio" of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini Snc, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Michele FigusOphthalmology Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Chiara PosarelliOphthalmology Unit, Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy.
Francesco OddoneIRCCS Fondazione Bietti, Via Livenza, 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Sara GiammariaIRCCS Fondazione Bietti, Via Livenza, 3, 00198, Rome, Italy.
Matteo SacchiUniversity Eye Clinic, San Giuseppe Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marco PavanDatamantix S.R.L. Artificial Intelligence Company, Via Paolo Sarpi, 14/15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Dante Degli InnocentiDatamantix S.R.L. Artificial Intelligence Company, Via Paolo Sarpi, 14/15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Valentina OlivottoDatamantix S.R.L. Artificial Intelligence Company, Via Paolo Sarpi, 14/15, 33100, Udine, Italy.
Stefano L SensiDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences (DNISC), "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.
Rodolfo MastropasquaDepartment of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences (DNISC), "G. d'Annunzio" University of Chieti-Pescara, Via Dei Vestini 31, 66100, Chieti, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo distinguish functioning from failed filtration blebs (FBs) implementing a deep learning (DL) model on slit-lamp images.

methodsRetrospective, cross-sectional, multicenter study for development and validation of an artificial intelligence classification algorithm. The dataset consisted of 119 post-trabeculectomy FB images of whom we were aware of the surgical outcome. The ground truth labels were annotated and images splitted into three outcome classes: complete (C) or qualified success (Q), and failure (F). Images were prepared implementing various data cleaning and data transformations techniques. A set of DL models were trained using different ResNet architectures as the backbone. Transfer and ensemble learning were then applied to obtain a final combined model. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve, and area under the precision-recall curve were calculated to evaluate the final model. Kappa coefficient and P value on the accuracy measure were used to prove the statistical significance level.

resultsThe DL approach reached good results in unraveling FB functionality. Overall, the model accuracy reached a score of 74%, with a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 87%. The area under the ROC curve was 0.8, whereas the area under the precision-recall curve was 0.74. The P value was equal to 0.00307, and the Kappa coefficient was 0.58.

conclusionsAll considered metrics supported that the final DL model was able to discriminate functioning from failed FBs, with good accuracy. This approach could support clinicians in the patients' management after glaucoma surgery in absence of adjunctive clinical data.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGlaucomaTrabeculectomyArtificial IntelligenceCross-Sectional StudiesHumansIntraocular PressureRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBleb functionalityDeep learningFiltration blebFiltration surgeryGlaucomaSurgical outcome

Identifiers

PMID37530849
PMCPMC10805808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.