Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530804›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2023

Electrophysiological insights into deep brain stimulation of the network disorder dystonia.

Denise Franz, Angelika Richter, Rüdiger Köhling

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Denise FranzOscar Langendorff Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Angelika RichterInstitute of Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Toxicology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Rüdiger KöhlingOscar Langendorff Institute of Physiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany. ruediger.koehling@uni-rostock.de.
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a treatment for modulating the abnormal central neuronal circuitry, has become the standard of care nowadays and is sometimes the only option to reduce symptoms of movement disorders such as dystonia. However, on the one hand, there are still open questions regarding the pathomechanisms of dystonia and, on the other hand, the mechanisms of DBS on neuronal circuitry. That lack of knowledge limits the therapeutic effect and makes it hard to predict the outcome of DBS for individual dystonia patients. Finding electrophysiological biomarkers seems to be a promising option to enable adapted individualised DBS treatment. However, biomarker search studies cannot be conducted on patients on a large scale and experimental approaches with animal models of dystonia are needed. In this review, physiological findings of deep brain stimulation studies in humans and animal models of dystonia are summarised and the current pathophysiological concepts of dystonia are discussed.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationDystoniaDystonic DisordersAnimalsElectrophysiological PhenomenaHumansModels, AnimalAnimal models of dystoniaCortico-basal ganglia-thalamo-cortical networkDeep brain stimulationDopaminergic dysfunctionDystoniaStriatal synaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID37530804
PMCPMC10499667
OpenAlexW4385476907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.