Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530787›Full record

ArticleExperimental brain research2023

Psychophysiological stress influences temporal accuracy.

Nicola Cellini, Simon Grondin, Franca Stablum, Michela Sarlo, Giovanna Mioni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nicola CelliniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy. nicola.cellini@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0306-4408
Simon GrondinÉcole de Psychologie, Université Laval, 2325 Rue Des Bibliothèques, Québec, QC, G1V 0A6, Canada.
Franca StablumDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy.
Michela SarloDepartment of Communication Sciences, Humanities and International Studies, University of Urbino, Via Saffi 15, 61029, Urbino, Italy.
Giovanna MioniDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padova, Via Venezia 8, 35131, Padua, Italy. giovanna.mioni@unipd.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Distortions of duration perception are often observed in response to highly arousing stimuli, but the exact mechanisms that evoke these variations are still under debate. Here, we investigate the effect of induced physiological arousal on time perception. Thirty-eight university students (22.89 ± 2.5; 28 females) were tested with spontaneous finger-tapping tasks and a time bisection task (with stimuli between 300 and 900 ms). Before the time bisection task, half of the participants (STRESS group) performed a stress-inducing task, i.e., the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT), whereas the other participants (CONTROL group) performed a control task, the Paced Auditory Number Reading Task (PANRAT). The PASAT induced a greater heart rate, but not electrodermal, increase, as well as a more unpleasant and arousing state compared to the PANRAT. Moreover, although the two groups presented a similar performance at the finger-tapping tasks, participants in the STRESS group showed better temporal performance at the time bisection task (i.e., lower constant error) than the controls. These results indicate that psychophysiological stress may alter the subsequent perception of time.

Indexed as

Stress, PhysiologicalStress, PsychologicalTime PerceptionAdultFemaleHeart RateHumansMaleYoung AdultAutonomic nervous systemFinger tappingHeart rateSkin conductanceTime bisection taskTime perception

Identifiers

PMID37530787
PMCPMC10471659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.