Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530305›Full record

ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2023

Cost of screening, out-of-pocket expenditure & quality of life for diabetes & hypertension in India.

Sehr Brar, Gunjeet Kaur, Malaisamy Muniyandi, Nagarajan Karikalan, Henna Bano, Anil Bhansali, Sanjay Jain, Savita Kumari, Shankar Prinja

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sehr BrarDepartment of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Gunjeet KaurDepartment of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Malaisamy MuniyandiDepartment of Health Economics, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Nagarajan KarikalanDepartment of Health Economics, Indian Council of Medical Research-National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Henna BanoDepartment of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Anil BhansaliDepartment of Endocrinology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Sanjay JainDepartment of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Savita KumariDepartment of Internal Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Shankar PrinjaDepartment of Community Medicine & School of Public Health, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India.
Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research · INIndian Council of Medical Research · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background & objectives: The Government of India has initiated a population based screening (PBS) for noncommunicable diseases (NCDs). A health technology assessment agency in India commissioned a study to assess the cost-effectiveness of screening diabetes and hypertension. The present study was undertaken to estimate the cost of PBS for Type II diabetes and hypertension. Second, out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) for outpatient care and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among diabetes and hypertension patients were estimated. Methods: Economic cost of PBS of diabetes and hypertension was assessed using micro-costing methodology from a health system perspective in two States. A total of 165 outpatients with diabetes, 300 with hypertension and 497 with both were recruited to collect data on OOPE and HRQoL. Results: On coverage of 50 per cent, the PBS of diabetes and hypertension incurred a cost of ₹ 45.2 per person screened. The mean OOPE on outpatient consultation for a patient with diabetes, hypertension and both diabetes and hypertension was ₹ 4381 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3786-4976), ₹ 1427 (95% CI: 1278-1576) and ₹ 3932 (95% CI: 3614-4250), respectively. Catastrophic health expenditure was incurred by 20, 1.3 and 14.8 per cent of patients with diabetes, hypertension and both diabetes and hypertension, respectively. The mean HRQoL score of patients with diabetes, hypertension and both was 0.76 (95% CI: 0.72-0.8), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.87-0.91) and 0.68 (95% CI: 0.66-0.7), respectively. Interpretations & conclusions: The findings of our study are useful for assessing cost-effectiveness of screening strategies for diabetes and hypertension.

Indexed as

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2HypertensionHealth ExpendituresHumansIndiaQuality of LifecomplicationsCostdiabeteshypertensionout-of-pocket expenditurequality of lifescreening

Identifiers

PMID37530305
PMCPMC10466497
OpenAlexW4385476120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.