ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023
Clinical profile and visual outcome in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy.
Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy in a high-risk diabetic adolescent: A rare clinical presentation.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- A Forensic Medical Evaluation of Cases Developing Permanent Sequelae Following Traffic Accident-Related Ocular Injuries.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Gestational ocular microvascular changes in healthy pregnancy: a longitudinal SS-OCTA study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To analyze the visual outcome in patients with traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) with respect to different treatment modalities, to study the correlation of initial visual loss with the final visual outcome, and to find out the predictor of final visual outcome in patients with indirect TON. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 36 eyes with TON was done. Data on clinical profile, including demographics, mode of trauma, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), pupillary reflex examination, and anterior and posterior segment examination, was collected. Presence and location of orbital and cranial fractures were identified from computed tomography scan. Visual outcomes following steroid therapy, optic nerve (ON) decompression, and in untreated patients were analyzed. Pre- and post-treatment BCVA were divided into three groups based on logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) as follows: group A: 3, group B: 2.9-1.3, and group C<1.3. BCVA values at follow-up visits were taken as the primary outcome measure. Association between various risk factors and final visual outcome in patients with indirect TON was also analyzed. Results: Out of 34 patients whose 36 eyes were studied, three (8.8%) patients were females and 31 (91.2%) patients were males. Most common mode of trauma was road traffic accident (RTA; 91.2%), which was followed by fall (8.8%) and assault (2.9%). Pre- and post-treatment BCVA values of 36 eyes were compared, and improvement in BCVA after treatment was found to be statistically significant. Also, 28.6% of patients with presenting BCVA of no light perception showed improvement compared to 94.1% and 100% in groups B and C, respectively. Orbital wall fractures were seen in 80.5% (n = 29) of the patients, with lateral wall fracture being the most common (58.3%) followed by medial wall (33.3%), roof (27.7%), floor (27.7%), and optic strut (5%). Conclusion: Baseline BCVA had significant association with final vision improvement. Lateral wall fracture was the most common fracture associated with indirect TON. Patients treated with high-dose corticosteroids, irrespective of the time of presentation, had a better visual outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.