Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530269›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023

Accuracy of an artificial intelligence-based mobile application for detecting cataracts: Results from a field study.

Chandrakumar Subbiah Vasan, Sachin Gupta, Madhu Shekhar, Kamatchi Nagu, Logesh Balakrishnan, Ravilla D Ravindran, Thulasiraj Ravilla, Ganesh-Babu Balu Subburaman

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chandrakumar Subbiah VasanTNSBCS-SOC, Regional Institute of Ophthalmology, Chennai, India.
Sachin GuptaSC Johnson College of Business, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, USA.
Madhu ShekharCataract and IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Kamatchi NaguCataract and IOL Services, Aravind Eye Hospital, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Logesh BalakrishnanLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ravilla D RavindranChairman, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Thulasiraj RavillaLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Ganesh-Babu Balu SubburamanLAICO, Aravind Eye Care System, Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India.
Aravind Eye Hospital · INCornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the accuracy of e-Paarvai, an artificial intelligence-based smartphone application (app) that detects and grades cataracts using images taken with a smartphone by comparing with slit lamp-based diagnoses by trained ophthalmologists. Methods: In this prospective diagnostic study conducted between January and April 2022 at a large tertiary-care eye hospital in South India, two screeners were trained to use the app. Patients aged >40 years and with a best-corrected visual acuity <20/40 were recruited for the study. The app is intended to determine whether the eye has immature cataract, mature cataract, posterior chamber intra-ocular lens, or no cataract. The diagnosis of the app was compared with that of trained ophthalmologists based on slit-lamp examinations, the gold standard, and a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was estimated. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were computed. Results: The two screeners used the app to screen 2,619 eyes of 1,407 patients. In detecting cataracts, the app showed high sensitivity (96%) but low specificity (25%), an overall accuracy of 88%, a PPV of 92.3%, and an NPV of 57.8%. In terms of cataract grading, the accuracy of the app was high in detecting immature cataracts (1,875 eyes, 94.2%), but its accuracy was poor in detecting mature cataracts (73 eyes, 22%), posterior chamber intra-ocular lenses (55 eyes, 29.3%), and clear lenses (2 eyes, 2%). We found that the area under the curve in predicting ophthalmologists' cataract diagnosis could potentially be improved beyond the app's diagnosis based on using images only by incorporating information about patient sex and age (P < 0.0001) and best-corrected visual acuity (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: Although there is room for improvement, e-Paarvai app is a promising approach for diagnosing cataracts in difficult-to-reach populations. Integrating this with existing outreach programs can enhance the case detection rate.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionMobile ApplicationsArtificial IntelligenceHumansProspective StudiesVisual AcuityArtificial intelligencecataract detectioncomputer visionsmartphone apps

Identifiers

PMID37530269
PMCPMC10538832
OpenAlexW4385447318

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.