Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530263›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2023

An ophthalmology professionalism survey tool: outcomes from a multi-center study in Central India.

Katherine A Joltikov, Rajiv Khandekar, Pratik Shenoy, Sashi Jain, Kavita Kumar, Uma Sharan Tiwari, Shipli Kochar, Devendra Sood, Deepak P Edward, Alok Sen

Open access · diamondAbstract readMulticenter StudyComment
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 81% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Katherine A JoltikovUIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, 1855 West Taylor Street, Chicago Illinois, USA.
Rajiv KhandekarDepartment of Epidemiology and Public Health, King Khalid Eye Specialist Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Pratik ShenoyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh Trust, Sadguru Netra, Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sashi JainDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh Trust, Sadguru Netra, Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Kavita KumarDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Uma Sharan TiwariDepartment of Ophthalmology, Gajra Raja Medical College, Gwalior, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Shipli KocharDepartment of Ophthalmology, Sardar Patel Medical College, Bikaner, Rajasthan, India.
Devendra SoodDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh Trust, Sadguru Netra, Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Deepak P EdwardUIC Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago, 1855 West Taylor Street, Chicago Illinois, USA.
Alok SenDepartment of Ophthalmology, Shri Sadguru Seva Sangh Trust, Sadguru Netra, Chikitsalaya, Chitrakoot, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Sardar Patel Medical College · INGajara Raja Medical College · INUniversity of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USGandhi Medical College · INUniversity of Illinois Chicago · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To describe a professionalism survey tool and its use to assess knowledge of medical professionalism in ophthalmology training programs in Central India. Settings and Design: Multi-center survey study. Methods: A validated 33-question, scenario-based survey addressing professionalism attributes was administered at five centers in central India. The attributes tested included "personal characteristics," "physician-patient relationships," "workplace practice and relationships," and "socially responsible behaviors." A mean attribute score (%) was calculated and compared to "gold standard" responses by a group of expert senior ophthalmologists (100% agreement for responses). Results: A total of 225 participants completed the survey; 124 residents, 47 fellows, and 54 consultants (98.4% response rate). The total mean attribute score was 80.7 ± 9.1 (min 16.67, max 100). There was variation in the mean attribute score by professionalism attribute (P < 0.001), and a trend toward higher mean attribute scores for consultants compared to trainees across all attribute groups. The scores for "personal characteristics" (93 ± 9.7) and "physician-patient relationship" (82 ± 15.8) were the highest, whereas scores for "socially responsible behaviors" (73.9 ± 18.6) and "workplace practices" were low (72 ± 13). Conclusions: There is a generally high level of professionalism knowledge among ophthalmologists in central India. The results suggest that experience does impact knowledge of professionalism. Potential for improvement in professionalism exists in around "workplace practices", and around "socially responsible behaviors". These findings may serve as a valuable discussion starter and teaching tool to enhance professionalism in ophthalmology training programs.

Indexed as

Internship and ResidencyOphthalmologyHumansIndiaPhysician-Patient RelationsProfessionalismSurveys and QuestionnairesMedical educationprofessionalismsurvey study

Identifiers

PMID37530263
PMCPMC10538811
OpenAlexW4385466094

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.