Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37530109›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2023

Bridging semiempirical and ab initio QM/MM potentials by Gaussian process regression and its sparse variants for free energy simulation.

Ryan Snyder, Bryant Kim, Xiaoliang Pan, Yihan Shao, Jingzhi Pu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Predictive free energy simulations through hierarchical distillation of quantum Hamiltonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Surface-Accelerated String Method for Locating Minimum Free Energy Paths.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Computer physics communications · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan SnyderDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 N Blackford St., Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-6703-3652
Bryant KimDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 N Blackford St., Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.
Xiaoliang PanDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Pkwy, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6399-4853
Yihan ShaoDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, 101 Stephenson Pkwy, Norman, Oklahoma 73019, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9337-341X
Jingzhi PuDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, 402 N Blackford St., Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3042-335X

Funding

Multiscale Modeling of Enzymatic Reactions and Firefly BioluminescenceR01GM135392 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SHAO, YIHAN · 2019 to 2022
$1.0M
Determining ATPase Mechanism of ABC-Transporters by Reaction Path Force MatchingR15GM116057 · NIGMS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI PU, JINGZHI · 2015 to 2015
$366k
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135392NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM116057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Free energy simulations that employ combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potentials at ab initio QM (AI) levels are computationally highly demanding. Here, we present a machine-learning-facilitated approach for obtaining AI/MM-quality free energy profiles at the cost of efficient semiempirical QM/MM (SE/MM) methods. Specifically, we use Gaussian process regression (GPR) to learn the potential energy corrections needed for an SE/MM level to match an AI/MM target along the minimum free energy path (MFEP). Force modification using gradients of the GPR potential allows us to improve configurational sampling and update the MFEP. To adaptively train our model, we further employ the sparse variational GP (SVGP) and streaming sparse GPR (SSGPR) methods, which efficiently incorporate previous sample information without significantly increasing the training data size. We applied the QM-(SS)GPR/MM method to the solution-phase SN2 Menshutkin reaction, NH3+CH3Cl→CH3NH3++Cl-, using AM1/MM and B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)/MM as the base and target levels, respectively. For 4000 configurations sampled along the MFEP, the iteratively optimized AM1-SSGPR-4/MM model reduces the energy error in AM1/MM from 18.2 to 4.4 kcal/mol. Although not explicitly fitting forces, our method also reduces the key internal force errors from 25.5 to 11.1 kcal/mol/Å and from 30.2 to 10.3 kcal/mol/Å for the N-C and C-Cl bonds, respectively. Compared to the uncorrected simulations, the AM1-SSGPR-4/MM method lowers the predicted free energy barrier from 28.7 to 11.7 kcal/mol and decreases the reaction free energy from -12.4 to -41.9 kcal/mol, bringing these results into closer agreement with their AI/MM and experimental benchmarks.

Identifiers

PMID37530109
PMCPMC10400118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.