ArticleThe Journal of chemical physics2023
Bridging semiempirical and ab initio QM/MM potentials by Gaussian process regression and its sparse variants for free energy simulation.
Article in The Journal of chemical physics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Systematically Improvable and Locality Accelerated Enzymatic Reactivity Modeling: Toward Chemical Accuracy at Affordable Cost.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2026Article
- Predictive free energy simulations through hierarchical distillation of quantum Hamiltonians.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Computer-Aided Drug Design (CADD) Tools for the Finding of Potent Biologically Active Small Molecules: Traditional to Modern Approach.Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening · 2026Review
- Machine Learning Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical Potentials: Evaluating Transferability in Dihydrofolate Reductase-Catalyzed Reactions.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- CHARMM at 45: Enhancements in Accessibility, Functionality, and Speed.The journal of physical chemistry. B · 2024Review
- Electronic and Nuclear Quantum Effects on Proton Transfer Reactions of Guanine-Thymine (G-T) Mispairs Using Combined Quantum Mechanical/Molecular Mechanical and Machine Learning Potentials.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Training machine learning potentials for reactive systems: A Colab tutorial on basic models.Journal of computational chemistry · 2024Article
- Surface-Accelerated String Method for Locating Minimum Free Energy Paths.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2024Article
- Perspectives on Computational Enzyme Modeling: From Mechanisms to Design and Drug Development.ACS omega · 2024Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Free energy simulations that employ combined quantum mechanical and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) potentials at ab initio QM (AI) levels are computationally highly demanding. Here, we present a machine-learning-facilitated approach for obtaining AI/MM-quality free energy profiles at the cost of efficient semiempirical QM/MM (SE/MM) methods. Specifically, we use Gaussian process regression (GPR) to learn the potential energy corrections needed for an SE/MM level to match an AI/MM target along the minimum free energy path (MFEP). Force modification using gradients of the GPR potential allows us to improve configurational sampling and update the MFEP. To adaptively train our model, we further employ the sparse variational GP (SVGP) and streaming sparse GPR (SSGPR) methods, which efficiently incorporate previous sample information without significantly increasing the training data size. We applied the QM-(SS)GPR/MM method to the solution-phase SN2 Menshutkin reaction, NH3+CH3Cl→CH3NH3++Cl-, using AM1/MM and B3LYP/6-31+G(d,p)/MM as the base and target levels, respectively. For 4000 configurations sampled along the MFEP, the iteratively optimized AM1-SSGPR-4/MM model reduces the energy error in AM1/MM from 18.2 to 4.4 kcal/mol. Although not explicitly fitting forces, our method also reduces the key internal force errors from 25.5 to 11.1 kcal/mol/Å and from 30.2 to 10.3 kcal/mol/Å for the N-C and C-Cl bonds, respectively. Compared to the uncorrected simulations, the AM1-SSGPR-4/MM method lowers the predicted free energy barrier from 28.7 to 11.7 kcal/mol and decreases the reaction free energy from -12.4 to -41.9 kcal/mol, bringing these results into closer agreement with their AI/MM and experimental benchmarks.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.