Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529770›Full record

ReviewTelemedicine reports2023

The Role of Virtual Triage in Improving Clinician Experience and Satisfaction: A Narrative Review.

George A Gellert, Joanna Rasławska-Socha, Natalia Marcjasz, Tim Price, Alicja Heyduk, Agata Mlodawska, Kacper Kuszczyński, Aleksandra Jędruch, Piotr Orzechowski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Telemedicine reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Uses of Virtual Care in Primary Care: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

George A GellertEvidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3519-7486
Joanna Rasławska-SochaClinical Validation and Evidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.
Natalia MarcjaszClinical Validation and Evidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0036-5985
Tim PriceProduct Development, Infermedica Inc., London, United Kingdom.
Alicja HeydukImplementation and Customer Success, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.
Agata MlodawskaClinical Validation and Evidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.
Kacper KuszczyńskiClinical Validation and Evidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.
Aleksandra JędruchClinical Validation and Evidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.
Piotr OrzechowskiClinical Validation and Evidence-Based Impact and Value Demonstration, Infermedica Inc., Wrocław, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This review examines the literature on improving clinician satisfaction with a focus on what has been most effective in improving experience from the perspective of clinicians, and the potential role that virtual triage (VT) technology can play in delivering positive clinician experiences that improve clinical care, and bring value to health care delivery organizations (HDOs). Methods: Review and synthesis of evidence on clinician satisfaction indicating a potential for VT to favorably impact clinician experience, sense of effectiveness, efficiency, and reduction of administrative task burden. Analysis considers how to conceptualize and the value of improving clinician experience, leading clinician dissatisfiers, and the potential role of VT in improving clinician experience/satisfaction. Results: Contributors to poor clinician experience/satisfaction where VT could have a beneficial impact include better managing resource limitations, administrative workload, lack of care coordination, information overload, and payer interactions. VT can improve clinician experience through the technology's ability to leverage real-time actionable data clinicians can use, streamlining patient-clinician communications, personalizing care delivery, optimizing care coordination, and better aligning digital/virtual services with clinical practice. From an organizational perspective, improvements in clinician experience and satisfaction derive from establishing an effective digital back door, increasing the clinical impact of and satisfaction derived from telemedicine and virtual care, and enhancing clinician centricity. Conclusions: By embracing digital transformation and implementing solutions such as VT that focus on improving patient and clinician experience, HDOs can address barriers to delivery of high-quality, efficient, and cost-effective care. VT is a digital health tool that can create a more streamlined and satisfying experience for clinicians and the patients they care for. VT is a technology solution that can help clinicians make faster more informed decisions, reduces avoidable care, improves communication with patients and within care teams, and lowers their administrative burden so they have more quality time to care for patients.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceclinician experienceclinician satisfactionsymptom checkervirtual triage

Identifiers

PMID37529770
PMCPMC10389257

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.