Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529655›Full record

ReviewClinical kidney journal2023

Future landscape for the management of membranous nephropathy.

Fernando Caravaca-Fontán, Federico Yandian, Fernando C Fervenza

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Hope or hype? Clinicians' dilemma in the era of ever-expanding antigens in membranous nephropathy.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Fernando Caravaca-FontánDepartment of Nephrology, Instituto de Investigación Hospital "12 de Octubre" (imas12), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5830-9663
Federico YandianDepartment of Nephrology, Hospital de Clínicas "Dr Manuel Quintela", Montevideo, Uruguay.
Fernando C FervenzaDivision of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9952-209X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among all glomerular diseases, membranous nephropathy (MN) is perhaps the one in which major progress has been made in recent decades, in both the understanding of the pathogenesis and treatment. Despite the overall significant response rates to these therapies-particularly rituximab and cyclical regimen based on corticosteroids and cyclophosphamide-cumulative experience over the years has shown, however, that 20%-30% of cases may confront resistant disease. Thus, these unmet challenges in the treatment of resistant forms of MN require newer approaches. Several emerging new agents-developed primarily for the treatment of hematological malignancies or rheumatoid diseases-are currently being evaluated in MN. Herein we conducted a narrative review on future therapeutic strategies in the disease. Among the different novel therapies, newer anti-CD20 agents (e.g. obinutuzumab), anti-CD38 (e.g. daratumumab, felzartamab), immunoadsorption or anti-complement therapies (e.g. iptacopan) have gained special attention. In addition, several technologies and innovations developed primarily for cancer (e.g. chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, sweeping antibodies) seem particularly promising. In summary, the future therapeutic landscape in MN seems encouraging and will definitely move the management of this disease towards a more precision-based approach.

Indexed as

belimumabfelzartamabiptacopanobinutuzumabresistant membranous nephropathy

Identifiers

PMID37529655
PMCPMC10387398

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.