ArticleClinical kidney journal2023
Average creatinine-urea clearance: revival of an old analytical technique?
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Incremental Hemodialysis: Review of Clinical Trials Focused on Patients Undergoing Once-Weekly Hemodialysis.Nutrients · 2025Pooled it
- Evaluation of Kidney Function in Cirrhosis: Methods and Pitfalls.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Advancing Breast Cancer Diagnosis: Optimization of Raman Spectroscopy for Urine-Based Early Detection.Biomedicines · 2025Article
- Article
- Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting.Journal of hepatology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Creatinine-based equations such as the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) are recommended for estimating glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in clinical practice, but have reduced performance in advanced stages of chronic kidney disease. However, only rarely studies have evaluated the performance of eGFR by measuring the average of the urinary clearances of creatinine and urea (mCl Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated the usefulness of mCl Results: In the whole sample, the mCl Conclusions: The study described the best performance of mCl
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.