Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529627›Full record

ArticleClinical and translational radiation oncology2023

Initial clinical experience building a dual CT- and MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy program.

Alex T Price, Joshua P Schiff, Eric Laugeman, Borna Maraghechi, Matthew Schmidt, Tong Zhu, Francisco Reynoso, Yao Hao, Taeho Kim, Eric Morris and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and translational radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Adaptive radiotherapy incident-informed team training: a development and feasibility study.Technical innovations & patient support in radiation oncology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Adaptive radiotherapy for gastrointestinal malignancies.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Alex T PriceUniversity Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Joshua P SchiffWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Eric LaugemanWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Borna MaraghechiCity of Hope Orange County, Department of Radiation Oncology, Irvine, CA, USA.
Matthew SchmidtWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tong ZhuWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Francisco ReynosoWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Yao HaoWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Taeho KimWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Eric MorrisWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Xiaodong ZhaoWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Geoffrey D HugoWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Gregory VlacichWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Carl J DeSelmWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pamela P SamsonWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Brian C BaumannSpringfield Clinic, Department of Radiation Oncology, Springfield, IL, USA.
Shahed N BadiyanUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Dallas, TX, USA.
Clifford G RobinsonWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Hyun KimWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Lauren E HenkeUniversity Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Our institution was the first in the world to clinically implement MR-guided adaptive radiotherapy (MRgART) in 2014. In 2021, we installed a CT-guided adaptive radiotherapy (CTgART) unit, becoming one of the first clinics in the world to build a dual-modality ART clinic. Herein we review factors that lead to the development of a high-volume dual-modality ART program and treatment census over an initial, one-year period. Materials and Methods: The clinical adaptive service at our institution is enabled with both MRgART (MRIdian, ViewRay, Inc, Mountain View, CA) and CTgART (ETHOS, Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA) platforms. We analyzed patient and treatment information including disease sites treated, radiation dose and fractionation, and treatment times for patients on these two platforms. Additionally, we reviewed our institutional workflow for creating, verifying, and implementing a new adaptive workflow on either platform. Results: From October 2021 to September 2022, 256 patients were treated with adaptive intent at our institution, 186 with MRgART and 70 with CTgART. The majority (106/186) of patients treated with MRgART had pancreatic cancer, and the most common sites treated with CTgART were pelvis (23/70) and abdomen (20/70). 93.0% of treatments on the MRgART platform were stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), whereas only 72.9% of treatments on the CTgART platform were SBRT. Abdominal gated cases were allotted a longer time on the CTgART platform compared to the MRgART platform, whereas pelvic cases were allotted a shorter time on the CTgART platform when compared to the MRgART platform. Our adaptive implementation technique has led to six open clinical trials using MRgART and seven using CTgART. Conclusions: We demonstrate the successful development of a dual platform ART program in our clinic. Ongoing efforts are needed to continue the development and integration of ART across platforms and disease sites to maximize access and evidence for this technique worldwide.

Indexed as

Adaptive radiotherapyImage-guided radiotherapyMRI-guided radiotherapyStereotactic body radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID37529627
PMCPMC10388162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.