Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529592›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2023

Global review and guidelines to avoid opportunistic predation of birds and bats in mist nets.

Guilherme Wince de Moura, Karen Mustin, Fernando Antonio Silva Pinto, Sylvia Coelho Alves Sineiro, Bruna da Silva Xavier, Luciana Moraes Costa, Carlos Eduardo Lustosa Esbérard, Alexeia Barufatti, William Douglas Carvalho

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Guilherme Wince de MouraPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Meio Ambiente Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD) Dourados Brazil.
Karen MustinPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade Tropical Universidade Federal do Amapá (UNIFAP) Macapá Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2828-2316
Fernando Antonio Silva PintoInstituto Nacional da Mata Atlântica (INMA) Santa Teresa Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8814-3182
Sylvia Coelho Alves SineiroPrograma de Pós-Graduação Educação em Ciências e Saúde Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0200-0034
Bruna da Silva XavierPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ) Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-5041
Luciana Moraes CostaLaboratório de Ecologia de Mamíferos, Departamento de Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8080-4954
Carlos Eduardo Lustosa EsbérardLaboratório de Diversidade de Morcegos, Departamento de Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biologia Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro Seropédica Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6389-190X
Alexeia BarufattiPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Meio Ambiente Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD) Dourados Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8789-2117
William Douglas CarvalhoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Biodiversidade e Meio Ambiente Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados (UFGD) Dourados Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2518-9148

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mist nets are one of the most widely used techniques in the study of birds and bats worldwide. However, a number of risks are involved, including opportunistic predation. Given this potential cost, here we: (1) review the global literature to understand the factors that might contribute to predation risk for birds and bats captured in mist nets; (2) review existing guidelines for best practice use of mist nets; and (3) based on our reviews, recommend new guidelines for the use of mist nets to minimize the risk of opportunistic predation. Based on keyword in English, Spanish, Portuguese, and French, and using Google Scholar, Scopus, SciElo, and Web of Science, we found 48 articles reporting opportunistic predation. In the included articles, 178 predation events, involving 52 predator and 84 prey species, were reported. In most of the reports, the mist nets were placed at ground level, the bats and birds were preyed on from the shelf closest to the ground, the mist-net checks occurred at intervals of 1 h or 30 min and the most common predators were arboreal and scansorial species (primates and marsupials). Despite the occurrences of predation in 13 countries, guidelines for best practice mist-net use were found in only three, despite extensive searches and contact with key people in each country. Based on the existing guidelines and our results, we recommend that mist nets be fixed with the lowest shelf at least 50 cm above ground level and be checked at 15-min intervals; when predators are observed near mist nets, the nets either be constantly observed, closed, or relocated; suppressed the vegetation around the mist nets; captured animals be removed from the mist nets as soon as possible, and more than one researcher/technician should be in the field at all times.

Indexed as

avianChiropteramist‐netting protocolsopportunistic behaviorPasseriformesafe samplingtrophic interaction

Identifiers

PMID37529592
PMCPMC10388402

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.