Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529578›Full record

ReviewEcology and evolution2023

Mutualistic interactions between ants and fungi: A review.

Alain Dejean, Frédéric Azémar, Piotr Naskrecki, Maurice Tindo, Vivien Rossi, Christian Faucher, Hervé Gryta

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecology and evolution, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Ant-Plant Mutualism inInsects · 2024
    Article
  3. Ant's Nest as a microenvironment: DistinctEcology and evolution · 2024
    Article
  4. The fungusFrontiers in fungal biology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alain DejeanLaboratoire Écologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse INP, Université Toulouse 3 - Paul Sabatier (UPS) Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3561-2248
Frédéric AzémarLaboratoire Écologie Fonctionnelle et Environnement Université de Toulouse, CNRS, Toulouse INP, Université Toulouse 3 - Paul Sabatier (UPS) Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3098-8676
Piotr NaskreckiMuseum of Comparative Zoology Harvard University Cambridge Massachusetts USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0303-7354
Maurice TindoLaboratory of Biology and Physiology of Animal Organisms, Faculty of Science University of Douala Douala Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6217-6982
Vivien RossiRemote Sensing and Forest Ecology Lab, Higher Teacher's Training College Marien Ngouabi University Brazzaville Democratic Republic of the Congo.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5458-1523
Christian FaucherLaboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR 5174) CNRS IRD, Université Toulouse 3 Toulouse France.
Hervé GrytaLaboratoire Evolution & Diversité Biologique (EDB UMR 5174) CNRS IRD, Université Toulouse 3 Toulouse France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3070-5197

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The large amount of dead plant biomass caused by the final extinction events triggered a fungi proliferation that mostly differentiated into saprophytes degrading organic matter; others became parasites, predators, likely commensals, and mutualists. Among the last, many have relationships with ants, the most emblematic seen in the Neotropical myrmicine Attina that cultivate Basidiomycota for food. Among them, leaf-cutting, fungus-growing species illustrate an ecological innovation because they grow fungal gardens from fresh plant material rather than arthropod frass and plant debris. Myrmecophytes shelter "plant-ants" in hollow structures, the domatia, whose inner walls are lined with thin-walled Ascomycota hyphae that, in certain cases, are eaten by the ants, showing a form of convergence. Typically, these Ascomycota have antibacterial properties illustrating cases of farming for protection. Ant gardens, or mutualistic associations between certain ant species and epiphytes, shelter endophytic fungi that promote the growth of the epiphytes. Because the cell walls of certain Ascomycota hyphae remain sturdy after the death of the mycelium, they form resistant fibers used by ants to reinforce their constructions (e.g., galleries, shelters for tended hemipterans, and carton nests). Thus, we saw cases of "true" fungal agriculture involving planting, cultivating, and harvesting Basidiomycota for food with Attina. A convergence with "plant-ants" feeding on Ascomycota whose antibacterial activity is generally exploited (i.e., farming for protection). The growth of epiphytes was promoted by endophytic fungi in ant gardens. Finally, farming for structural materials occurred with, in one case, a leaf-cutting, fungus-growing ant using Ascomycota fibers to reinforce its nests.

Indexed as

ant constructionsant fungiculturecomposite materialsdefoliationfungi as food

Identifiers

PMID37529578
PMCPMC10375366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.