Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529217›Full record

ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023

3D printing of piezoelectric and bioactive barium titanate-bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Christian Polley, Thomas Distler, Caroline Scheufler, Rainer Detsch, Henrik Lund, Armin Springer, Dominik Schneidereit, Oliver Friedrich, Aldo R Boccaccini, Hermann Seitz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Advances in Microfluidic Cochlea-On-A-Chip.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Piezoelectric Biomaterial with Advanced Design for Tissue Infection Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Christian PolleyChair of Microfluidics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Thomas DistlerInstitute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Caroline ScheuflerChair of Microfluidics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
Rainer DetschInstitute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Henrik LundLeibniz Institute for Catalysis, Rostock, Germany.
Armin SpringerElectron Microscopy Centrum, University Hospital Rostock, Germany.
Dominik SchneidereitInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Oliver FriedrichInstitute of Medical Biotechnology, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Aldo R BoccacciniInstitute of Biomaterials, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Hermann SeitzChair of Microfluidics, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone healing is a complex process orchestrated by various factors, such as mechanical, chemical and electrical cues. Creating synthetic biomaterials that combine several of these factors leading to tailored and controlled tissue regeneration, is the goal of scientists worldwide. Among those factors is piezoelectricity which creates a physiological electrical microenvironment that plays an important role in stimulating bone cells and fostering bone regeneration. However, only a limited number of studies have addressed the potential of combining piezoelectric biomaterials with state-of-the-art fabrication methods to fabricate tailored scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Here, we present an approach that takes advantage of modern additive manufacturing techniques to create macroporous biomaterial scaffolds based on a piezoelectric and bioactive ceramic-crystallised glass composite. Using binder jetting, scaffolds made of barium titanate and 45S5 bioactive glass are fabricated and extensively characterised with respect to their physical and functional properties. The 3D-printed ceramic-crystallised glass composite scaffolds show both suitable mechanical strength and bioactive behaviour, as represented by the accumulation of bone-like calcium phosphate on the surface. Piezoelectric scaffolds that mimic or even surpass bone with piezoelectric constants ranging from 1 to 21 pC/N are achieved, depending on the composition of the composite. Using MC3T3-E1 osteoblast precursor cells, the scaffolds show high cytocompatibility coupled with cell attachment and proliferation, rendering the barium titanate/45S5 ceramic-crystallised glass composites promising candidates for bone tissue engineering.

Indexed as

3D printingBarium titanateBioactivityBone regenerationPiezoelectricity

Identifiers

PMID37529217
PMCPMC10387613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.