ArticleMaterials today. Bio2023
3D printing of piezoelectric and bioactive barium titanate-bioactive glass scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.
Article in Materials today. Bio, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- 4D piezoceramic-integrated scaffolds with bioelectric cues for skeletal muscle regeneration.Bioactive materials · 2026Article
- From Static Scaffolds to Responsive Implants: 3D-Printed Field-Active Bioceramics for Adaptive Bone Regeneration.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Review
- Evolutionary applications of electrical stimulation in bone repair: bibliometric trends and temporal dynamics.EFORT open reviews · 2026Review
- Biodegradable piezoelectric PHB-BT nanofiber scaffolds combined with ultrasound stimulation to accelerate bone regeneration by regulating CaTheranostics · 2026Article
- Piezoelectric Iron (II) Tungstate-Integrated Three-Dimensional-Printed Polycaprolactone Scaffolds for Ultrasound-Triggered Osteosarcoma Therapy and Ultrasound-Free Bone Repair.Biomaterials research · 2026Article
- Indirect 3D printing in tissue engineering: expanding materials used for improved scaffold functionality.Biomedical engineering online · 2025Review
- Frequency-Mode Study of Piezoelectric Devices for Non-Invasive Optical Activation.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Advances in Microfluidic Cochlea-On-A-Chip.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Nanomaterial-based scaffolds for bone regeneration with piezoelectric properties.Nanomedicine (London, England) · 2025Review
- Piezoelectric Biomaterial with Advanced Design for Tissue Infection Repair.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Review
- Piezoelectric biomaterials for providing electrical stimulation in bone tissue engineering: Barium titanate.Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2025Review
- Stimulus-responsive smart bioactive glass composites for repair of complex tissue defects.Theranostics · 2025Review
- Nanohexagonal iron barium titanate nanoparticles surface-modified NiFeRSC advances · 2024Article
- A Systematic Review on the Generation of Organic Structures through Additive Manufacturing Techniques.Polymers · 2024Review
- Three-Dimensional Printing Methods for Bioceramic-Based Scaffold Fabrication for Craniomaxillofacial Bone Tissue Engineering.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024Review
- Additively manufactured porous scaffolds by design for treatment of bone defects.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone healing is a complex process orchestrated by various factors, such as mechanical, chemical and electrical cues. Creating synthetic biomaterials that combine several of these factors leading to tailored and controlled tissue regeneration, is the goal of scientists worldwide. Among those factors is piezoelectricity which creates a physiological electrical microenvironment that plays an important role in stimulating bone cells and fostering bone regeneration. However, only a limited number of studies have addressed the potential of combining piezoelectric biomaterials with state-of-the-art fabrication methods to fabricate tailored scaffolds for bone tissue engineering. Here, we present an approach that takes advantage of modern additive manufacturing techniques to create macroporous biomaterial scaffolds based on a piezoelectric and bioactive ceramic-crystallised glass composite. Using binder jetting, scaffolds made of barium titanate and 45S5 bioactive glass are fabricated and extensively characterised with respect to their physical and functional properties. The 3D-printed ceramic-crystallised glass composite scaffolds show both suitable mechanical strength and bioactive behaviour, as represented by the accumulation of bone-like calcium phosphate on the surface. Piezoelectric scaffolds that mimic or even surpass bone with piezoelectric constants ranging from 1 to 21 pC/N are achieved, depending on the composition of the composite. Using MC3T3-E1 osteoblast precursor cells, the scaffolds show high cytocompatibility coupled with cell attachment and proliferation, rendering the barium titanate/45S5 ceramic-crystallised glass composites promising candidates for bone tissue engineering.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.