Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529197›Full record

ReviewClinics in orthopedic surgery2023

Anterior Shoulder Instability and Open Procedures: History, Indications, and Clinical Outcomes.

Mohamad Y Fares, Peter Boufadel, Mohammad Daher, Jonathan Koa, Akshay Khanna, Joseph A Abboud

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinics in orthopedic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Shoulder injuries in rugby union: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mohamad Y FaresDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8228-3953
Peter BoufadelDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7078-9148
Mohammad DaherDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9256-9952
Jonathan KoaDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3922-359X
Akshay KhannaSidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Joseph A AbboudDivision of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, Rothman Orthopaedic Institute, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3845-7220

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The shoulder, being the most mobile joint in the human body, is often susceptible to dislocations and subluxations more so than other joints. As such, shoulder instability constitutes a common complaint among patients worldwide, especially those who are young, participate in contact sports, and have increased innate flexibility in their joints. Management options in the setting of instability vary between conservative and surgical options that aim to mitigate symptoms and allow return of function. Surgical options can be arthroscopic and open, with a general shift among surgeons towards utilizing arthroscopic surgery in the past several decades. Nevertheless, open procedures still play a role in managing shoulder instability patients, especially those with significant bone loss, recurrent instability, coexisting shoulder pathologies, and high risk of failure with arthroscopic surgery. In these clinical settings, open procedures, like the Latarjet procedure, open Bankart repair, glenoid bone augmentation using iliac crest autograft or distal tibial allograft, and salvage options like glenohumeral arthrodesis and arthroplasty may show good clinical outcomes and low recurrence rates. Each of these open procedures possesses its own set of advantages and disadvantages and entails a specific set of indications based on published literature. It is important to cater treatment options to the individual patient in order to optimize outcomes and reduce the risk of complications. Future research on open shoulder stabilization procedures should focus on the long-term outcomes of recently utilized procedures, investigate different graft options for procedures involving bone augmentation, and conduct additional comparative analyses in order to establish concrete surgical management guidelines.

Indexed as

Joint DislocationsJoint InstabilityShoulder DislocationShoulder JointArthroscopyHumansRecurrenceShoulderBankart lesionsContact athleteGlenoid bone lossLabrumLatarjet

Identifiers

PMID37529197
PMCPMC10375816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.