Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37529057›Full record

ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2023

Effectiveness of a rehabilitation professional's advice and suggestions on a care manager's self-assessment scores of their care management.

Yoshio Suzuki, Reiko Ishiyama

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoshio SuzukiDoctoral Program in Health Sciences, International University of Health and Welfare: 4-1-6 Akasaka, Minato-ku, Tokyo 107-8402, Japan.
Reiko IshiyamaGraduate School, Department of Health and Welfare Management, International University of Health and Welfare, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

[Purpose] To verify how advice or suggestions from rehabilitation professionals affect self-assessment by care managers. [Participants and Methods] This was a cross-sectional study in which a survey was administered to care managers from in-home care support offices in nine randomly selected municipalities. The survey was used to self-assess how the advice and suggestions from rehabilitation professionals affected the participant's care management process. [Results] Responses were received from 419 participants (response rate 11.3%). Of these responses, 388 (92.6% valid response rate) were analyzed, which revealed that 349 (89.9%) participants had received support from a rehabilitation professional, while 39 (10.1%) had not. Participants who had received support from a rehabilitation professional had significantly higher self-assessment scores than those who had not. Univariate and multiple regression analyses revealed that the factors affecting the self-assessment score were as follows: community care conferences as a support system was a negative factor and years of experience as a care manager was a positive factor. [Conclusion] Advice and suggestions from rehabilitation professionals affect improved care managers' self-assessment scores.

Indexed as

Advice and suggestionsCare managementRehabilitation professionals

Identifiers

PMID37529057
PMCPMC10390033

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.