Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528947›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2021

Pulseless Electrical Activity: Echocardiographic Explanation of a Perplexing Phenomenon.

David C Parish, Hemant Goyal, Erskine James, Francis C Dane

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David C ParishDepartment of Medicine, Mercer University School of Medicine, Macon, GA, United States.
Hemant GoyalThe Wright Center for Graduate Medical Education, Scranton, PA, United States.
Erskine JamesDepartment of Internal Medicine, Atrium Health Navicent, Macon, GA, United States.
Francis C DaneDepartment of Psychology, Radford University, Radford, VA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pulseless electrical activity (PEA) is considered an enigmatic phenomenon in resuscitation research and practice. Finding individuals with no consciousness or pulse but with continued electrocardiographic (EKG) complexes obviously raises the question of how they got there. The development of monitors that can display the underlying rhythm has allowed us to differentiate between VF, asystole, and PEA. Lack of clear understanding of the emergence of PEA has limited the research and development of interventions that might improve the low rates of survival typically associated with PEA. Over 30 years of studying and practicing resuscitation have allowed the authors to see a substantial rise in PEA with variable survival rates, based on the patients' illness spectrum and intensity of monitoring. This paper presents a small case series of individuals with brain death whose family members consented to the echocardiographic observation of the dying process after disconnection from life support. The observation from these cases confirms that PEA is a late phase in the clinical dying process. Echocardiographic images delineate the stages of pseudo-PEA with ineffective contractions, PEA, and then asystole. The process is contiuous with none of the sudden phase shifts seen in dysrhythmic events such as VF, VT or SVT. The implications of these findings are that PEA is a common manifestation of tissue hypoxia and metabolic substrate depletion. Our findings offer prospects for studies of the development of interventions to improve PEA survival.

Indexed as

cardiac arrestdeath & dyingPEApulseless electrical activityVentricular Fibrillation

Identifiers

PMID37528947
PMCPMC10390303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.