Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528945›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and translational science2023

Feasibility and anticipated acceptability of community health worker-facilitated HPV self-sampling for cervical cancer screening around Lake County, Indiana.

Tiwaladeoluwa B Adekunle, Alyssa Arreola, Sathveka Sembian, Raquel Castro, Layla Claure, Lara Balian, Natalia M Rodriguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and translational science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Advancing regulatory science through real-world data and real-world evidence.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiwaladeoluwa B AdekunleBrian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2582-0948
Alyssa ArreolaCollege of Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Sathveka SembianWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Raquel CastroDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Layla ClaureDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Lara BalianDepartment of Public Health, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Natalia M RodriguezWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

Funding

Community-based Participatory Design of an HPV rapid diagnostic test for cervical cancer screening in South FloridaK01CA241073 · NCI · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI RODRIGUEZ, NATALIA MARIA · 2019 to 2023
$916k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA241073
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: In light of calls to engage community health workers (CHWs) in the delivery of cervical cancer screening innovations, this study explores CHW perspectives on i) barriers to cervical cancer screening in a predominantly Hispanic community in Lake County, Indiana, the county with the highest cervical mortality in the state; and ii) the acceptability and feasibility of CHW-facilitated human papillomavirus (HPV) self-sampling as a means of reducing screening disparities. Methods: In 2021, in-depth interviews were conducted with 15 CHWs employed by Lake County community-based organizations including clinics, schools, and faith-based organizations. Results: Harnessing CHWs' voices as insiders with knowledge of their communities' health landscape, our analysis identified multilevel barriers to screening that spanned individual, interpersonal, and community levels of the socio-ecological model. CHW-facilitated HPV self-sampling shows promise of mitigating several barriers to cervical cancer screening. Privacy, time saved, and comfort were perceived to be facilitators for acceptability, with concerns about the novelty of this approach and trust in provider (as opposed to CHW) expertise emerging as key barriers. In terms of feasibility, synergies with existing CHW work, and some community members' prior experience with self-sampling were found to be facilitators, while CHW's time limitations and self-efficacy in providing adequate medical support were areas of concern. Considerations for adoption included CHW training, gender concordance, safety, and respect, among others. Conclusion: This study provides critical insights from CHWs as key stakeholders on a screening model that directly engages them, which can inform implementation to increase screening in medically-underserved communities in the US.

Indexed as

cervical cancer screeningcommunity health workersHealth equityHPV self-sampling

Identifiers

PMID37528945
PMCPMC10388433

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.