ArticleProceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering2023
Evaluation of Low-contrast Detectability of Photon-Counting-Detector CT Using Channelized Hotelling Observer and an ACR Accreditation Phantom.
Article in Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Low-contrast detectability of photon-counting-detector CT at different scan modes and image types in comparison with energy-integrating-detector CT.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to evaluate the low-contrast detectability on a clinical whole-body photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT scanner and compare it with an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT scanner, using an efficient Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO)-based method previously developed and optimized on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom for routine quality control (QC) purpose. The low-contrast module of an ACR CT phantom was scanned on both the PCD-CT and EID-CT scanners, each with 10 different positionings. For PCD-CT, data were acquired at 120 kV with two major scan modes, standard resolution (SR) (collimation: 144×0.4 mm) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) (120×0.2 mm). Images were reconstructed with two major modes: virtual monochromatic energy at 70 keV and low-energy threshold (T3D), each with filtered-backprojection (Br44) and iterative reconstruction (Br44-3) kernels. For each positioning, 3 repeated scans were acquired for each scan mode at a fixed radiation dose setting (CTDIvol = 12 mGy). For EID-CT, scans (10 positionings × 3 repeated scans) were performed at a matched CTDIvol, and images were reconstructed using the same kernels with FBP and IR. A recently developed CHO-based method dedicated for QC of low-contrast performance on the ACR phantom was applied to calculate the low-contrast detectability (d') for each scan and reconstruction condition. Results showed that there was no significant difference in low-contrast detectability (d') between the UHR mode and SR mode (p = 0.360-0.942), and the T3D reconstruction resulted in 7.7%-14.6% higher d' than 70keV (p < 0.0016). Similar detectability levels were observed on PCD-CT and EID-CT. The PCD-CT: UHR-T3D had 6.2% higher d' than EID-CT with IR (p = 0.047) and 4.1% lower d' without IR (p = 0.122).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.