Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528843›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2023

Antibiotic-free vaginal microbiota transplant with donor engraftment, dysbiosis resolution and live birth after recurrent pregnancy loss: a proof of concept case study.

Tine Wrønding, Kilian Vomstein, Elleke F Bosma, Brynjulf Mortensen, Henrik Westh, Julie Elm Heintz, Sarah Mollerup, Andreas Munk Petersen, Laura M Ensign, Kevin DeLong and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Exercise and pathologic complete response to cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Awareness of the Vaginal Microbiome and Willingness to Undergo Vaginal Microbiota Transplant.Journal of obstetric, gynecologic, and neonatal nursing : JOGNN · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Progress in interventions for vaginal microecology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Tine WrøndingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fertility Clinic, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Kilian VomsteinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fertility Clinic, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Elleke F BosmaFreya Biosciences Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Brynjulf MortensenFreya Biosciences Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henrik WesthDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Julie Elm HeintzDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sarah MollerupDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Andreas Munk PetersenDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Laura M EnsignCenter for Nanomedicine at the Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21231, USA.
Kevin DeLongFreya Biosciences Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Johan E T van Hylckama VliegFreya Biosciences Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne Bloch ThomsenFreya Biosciences Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Henriette Svarre NielsenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Fertility Clinic, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Vaginal dysbiosis covers imbalances in the vaginal microbiota, defined by altered composition of bacteria, viruses, and fungi and is associated with euploid pregnancy losses, premature birth, infertility, or bacterial vaginosis. A large proportion of women who have vaginal dysbiosis do not experience any symptoms. Antibiotics are the traditional treatment, recently combined with local probiotics in some cases. Vaginal Microbiota Transplantation (VMT) with eubiotic vaginal bacterial microbiota after antibiotic eradication of pathogens has successfully been performed in a case study with five patients, but no VMT has been performed without the use of antibiotics. Methods: This is a proof of concept case study. The patient was found to have vaginal dysbiosis at the RPL clinic at Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre, Denmark on the 23rd of June 2021. She was offered and accepted to receive experimental treatment in the form of a VMT as a compassionate use case. VMT is the transfer of cervicovaginal secretions (CVS) from a healthy donor with a Findings: A 30-year-old patient with one livebirth and a complicated pregnancy history of two stillbirths and 1 s trimester pregnancy loss in gestational weeks 27 (2019), 17 (2020) and 23 (2020) respectively with complaints of vaginal irritation and discharge that had aggravated in all her pregnancies. Her vaginal microbiome composition showed a 90% dominance of Interpretation: Here we report a successful VMT with confirmed donor strain engraftment followed by a successful pregnancy and delivery after a series of late pregnancy losses/stillbirths. Findings suggest that VMT is a potential treatment for severe vaginal dysbiosis. Further, larger studies are required. Funding: The study was partially funded (i.e., analysis costs) by Freya Biosciences Aps, Fruebjergvej, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.

Indexed as

MiscarriageRecurrent pregnancy lossShotgun metagenomicsSingle nucleotide variantVaginal microbiomeVaginal microbiota transplantationVMT

Identifiers

PMID37528843
PMCPMC10388571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.