Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528812›Full record

ArticleAnnals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine2023

PHQ-9 DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY AND OPTIMAL CUT-OFF FOR DEPRESSION AMONG PATIENTS WITH STROKE IN NIGERIA.

I N Okeafor, C U Okeafor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of Ibadan postgraduate medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

I N OkeaforDepartment of Public Health, Federal Ministry of Health, Nigeria.
C U OkeaforDepartment of Mental Health, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Depression is one of the most common and devastating consequences among stroke survivors. In spite of the availability of treatment for depression, the non- or under-detection precludes patients from benefiting from it. Objectives: This study sought to validate the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ- 9) as a tool for detecting depression among patients with stroke. Methodology: A cross-sectional design comprising of adult patients diagnosed with stroke, who were attending the Neurology out-patient clinic of the University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital was employed in the study. The Receiver Operator Characteristics (ROC) curve and validity tests were performed using the Structured Clinical Interview for Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (SCID-DSM IV) as the gold standard. The optimal PHQ-9 cut-off was determined using Youden Index. Kappa statistics was performed at p<0.05. Results: The study had a total of 197 stroke cases with PHQ-9 and SCID-DSM IV findings. The median age was 54 years (range: 35-76 years). ROC Curve for PHQ-9 revealed an Area under the Curve (AUC) value of 0.93(95% CI: 0.88- 0.98). The optimal cut off value of six was obtained based on Youden Index. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive and negative predictive values at the optimal cut-off were 88.7%, 93.1%, 82.5% and 95.7% respectively. The Kappa statistics yielded 0.80 (95% CI: 0.68-0.86). Conclusion: PHQ-9 is a useful screening tool for identifying depression among patients with stroke. An optimal cut-off score of six for PHQ-9 should be adopted for patients with stroke in Nigeria to identify depression, and the provision of holistic care.

Indexed as

DepressionOptimal cut-offPHQ-9StrokeValidity

Identifiers

PMID37528812
PMCPMC10388424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.