Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528733›Full record

ReviewJournal of separation science2023

Ultralow flow liquid chromatography and related approaches: A focus on recent bioanalytical applications.

Michal Greguš, Alexander R Ivanov, Steven Ray Wilson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of separation science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michal GregušDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Barnett Institute of Chemical and Biological Analysis, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Alexander R IvanovDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Barnett Institute of Chemical and Biological Analysis, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Steven Ray WilsonHybrid Technology Hub-Centre of Excellence, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9755-1188

Funding

Effect of methodological and biological variability on molecular profiling of extracellular vesicles in cancer detectionR01CA218500 · NCI · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI GHIRAN, IONITA CALIN, IVANOV, ALEXANDER R. · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Robust ultra-high sensitivity proteomic technologies for limited samplesR35GM136421 · NIGMS · NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY · PI Alexander R. Ivanov · 2020 to 2026
$3.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218500NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM136421NIH HHS R01CA218500NIH HHS R35GM136421
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultralow flow LC employs ultra-narrow bore columns and mid-range pL/min to low nL/min flow rates (i.e., ≤20 nL/min). The separation columns that are used under these conditions are typically 2-30 μm in inner diameter. Ultralow flow LC systems allow for exceptionally high sensitivity and frequently high resolution. There has been an increasing interest in the analysis of scarce biological samples, for example, circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles, organelles, and single cells, and ultralow flow LC was efficiently applied to such samples. Hence, advances towards dedicated ultralow flow LC instrumentation, technical approaches, and higher throughput (e.g., tens-to-hundreds of single cells analyzed per day) were recently made. Here, we review the types of ultralow flow LC technology, followed by a discussion of selected representative ultralow flow LC applications, focusing on the progress made in bioanalysis of amount-limited samples during the last 10 years. We also discuss several recently reported high-sensitivity applications utilizing flow rates up to 100 nL/min, which are below commonly used nanoLC flow rates. Finally, we discuss the path forward for future developments of ultralow flow LC.

Indexed as

Chromatography, LiquidBioanalysisMonolithOmicsOpen tubular LCUltralow flow LC

Identifiers

PMID37528733
PMCPMC11087205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.