ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2023
Postoperative Choroidal Vascular Biomarkers in Eyes with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment-Related Giant Retinal Tears.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Retinal and Choroidal Vasculature in Fellow Eyes of Patients With Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Using Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography.Translational vision science & technology · 2025Article
- Comparison of Vessel Density and Retinal Sensitivity After Scleral Buckling and Phacovitrectomy in the Management of Macula-on Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
- Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Repair by Pars Plana Vitrectomy with and without Scleral Buckling: A Propensity Score Analysis.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeChoroidal vascularity index (CVI) and choriocapillaris flow area (CFA) are perfusion biomarkers relevant to retinal disease management. There is limited knowledge regarding these biomarkers in eyes that have been successfully treated for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD) due to giant retinal tears (GRTs). This study aimed to analyze the relationship between choroidal perfusion biomarkers and functional outcomes in surgically treated eyes with GRT-associated RRD and their fellow eyes.
methodsA total of 33 GRT eyes and 29 fellow eyes were included in this study. All RRD-GRT eyes were treated with vitrectomy and categorized into two groups based on whether additional scleral buckles (SB) were placed. Visual and choroidal features were compared between the groups.
resultsThe subjects had an average age of 55.18 years, a mean time of 2.36 weeks before surgery, and a mean follow-up time of 25.9 months. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was substantially worse in GRT eyes (1.9 logMAR) than in fellow control eyes (0.23 logMAR) but substantially improved after surgery (0.59 logMAR). There were no differences in the presurgical characteristics and BCVA between the eyes that did and did not undergo SB. Long-term CVI and CFA were lower in eyes with GRT than in their fellow eyes. Among eyes with GRT, those with SB had significantly lower CVI and CFA. Correlation analysis revealed that the CVI and CFA were positively correlated with visual outcomes (negative correlation with logMAR).
conclusionDespite successful surgical repair, long-term functional and choroidal evaluations showed permanent changes in eyes with GRT. Positive correlations between perfusion biomarkers and visual function suggest that better choroidal vasculature is associated with better visual outcomes. The results of this study highlight the benefits of analyzing choroidal vasculature biomarkers and the relationship between the choroidal anatomy and vision.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.