ArticleHead & face medicine2023
A 16-year retrospective study of vascular anomalies in the head and neck region.
Article in Head & face medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Nasal Arteriovenous Malformation Presenting With Sebaceous Hyperplasia on Superficial Biopsy: A Case of Clinicopathological Discordance.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Odontogenic Infection Associated with Facial Vascular Malformation: Diagnostic, Surgical, and Quality-of-Life Considerations That Should Not Be Overlooked.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Laser treatment of oral vascular anomalies. A retrospective observational study.Medicina oral, patologia oral y cirugia bucal · 2026Observational
- Veinguard: a rare case of an external jugular vein angioma.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Article
- Extremely Extensive Vascular Malformation Requires Special Preparation for Simple Dental Surgical Procedures-Case Report.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- An Unusual Lingual Ulcerated Capillary Angioma After Dressmaker Needle Trauma, Above Migratory Glossitis Lesion, in a Patient With a History of Cancer: A Case Report.Case reports in dentistry · 2025Article
- Rare giant intradural epidural hemolymphangioma: A case report.World journal of clinical cases · 2024Article
- New Insights into Cervicofacial Vascular Anomalies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Venous malformation differential diagnosis with an odontogenic abscess on a pediatric patient. Case report and review of the literature.Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depending on the diagnostic modality, the classification of vascular anomalies varies and so does the nomenclature. The 'International Society for the Study of Vascular Anomalies' (ISSVA) is the most widely accepted classification in the literature and is mainly based on the radiologic and clinical presentation. The aim of this article is to review the clinical practice of diagnosis and treatment of vascular anomalies in the head and neck region in a university hospital, with special focus on the nomenclature. All patients with a vascular anomaly presenting to the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery were reviewed in a retrospective manner. Nomenclature, diagnostic process, lesion characteristics, treatment and outcome were examined. The lesions were (re)classified according to the ISSVA classification. A total of 185 patients were identified, of which 12.4% (n = 23) had a congenital anomaly. After reclassification, the most common lesions were venous malformations (n = 47, 25.4%), followed by lobular capillary hemangiomas (n = 17, 9.2%). A group of 39 anomalies could not be further specified. One hundred and one patients (54,6%) received treatment, of which 93 were treated surgically (92,1% of treated patients). Endovascular treatment was considered in 41 patients but applied in only eight. This strict selection led to a low a complication rate. We provide an overview of the clinical practice in the management of vascular anomalies in a university hospital. The histology report is a source of miscommunication because clinicians use the ISSVA classification, while pathologists use the WHO classification. Every professional involved should be aware of the differences in classification and nomenclature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.