Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37528448›Full record

ArticleMicrobial cell factories2023

A promising microbial α-amylase production, and purification from Bacillus cereus and its assessment as antibiofilm agent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa pathogen.

Amal M Abo-Kamer, Ibrahim S Abd-El-Salam, Faten A Mostafa, Abd-El-Rahman A Mustafa, Lamiaa A Al-Madboly

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial cell factories, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Purification and Characterization of α-Amylase fromCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amal M Abo-KamerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Ibrahim S Abd-El-SalamDepartemet of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt.
Faten A MostafaDepartemet of Chemistry of Natural and Microbial Products, National Research Centre, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt.
Abd-El-Rahman A MustafaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Lamiaa A Al-MadbolyDepartment of Pharmaceutical Microbiology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. lamia.youssif@pharm.tanta.edu.eg.
Tanta University · EGNational Research Centre · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimThe purpose of the current study is to isolate a heavily amylase-producing bacteria of the genus Bacillus from soil samples, optimize the production of the enzyme, purify it, and evaluate its activity against biofilm-producing bacteria. A total of 12 soil samples were collected and screened for promising Bacillus species with good amylolytic activity. Isolation was done by serial dilution and plating technique and amylolytic activity was determined by starch agar plate method. Among the 12 Bacillus isolates recovered from soil samples, 7 showed positive α-amylase production. The best isolate that recorded the greatest amylolytic activity was selected for further studies. This isolate was identified by 16S rRNA sequencing as Bacillus cereus and registered under gene bank accession number OP811897. Furthermore, the α-amylase enzyme was produced by a submerged fermentation technique using best production media and partially purified by ammonium sulfate and chilled ethanol and molecular weight had been determined by SDS-PAGE gel electrophoresis. The production of α-amylase was optimized experimentally by one-factor at a time protocol and statistically by Plackett-Burman design as well as RSM CCD design. Data obtained from OFAT and CCD revealed that α-amylase activities were 1.5- and twofold respectively higher as compared to un-optimized conditions. The most significant factors had been identified and optimized by CCD design.

resultsAmong the eleven independent variables tested by PBD, glucose, peptone, (NH4)

conclusionsA highly stable purified α-amylase from B. cereus showed promising antibiofilm activity against one of the clinically important biofilm-forming MDR organisms that could be used as a cost-effective tool in pharmaceutical industries.

Indexed as

alpha-AmylasesBacillusBacillus cereusBiofilmsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationPseudomonas aeruginosaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilTemperaturealpha-AmylasesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSoilAmylaseAmylolytic activityAntibiofilmCLSMPartial purificationRSMSoil bacteria

Identifiers

PMID37528448
PMCPMC10391895
OpenAlexW4385446140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.